"... In PAGE 3: ...hat they are capable of changing shape over time if the dynamics demand this of them (i.e., the morphogenetic aspect). Before we embark on a discussion of object-oriented physical design for particles within elds using the robot scenario to guide by example, we present Table1 to illustrate how, through mappings from one discipline to another, di erent areas t into this general scenario scheme.... ..."

"... In PAGE 16: ... This not only veri es the approximate correctness of the fast simulation program, but indicates which aspects of a simulation are most important in simulating missing Et triggers. Table7 shows the QCD background rates and the mean and sigma of the missing Et calculated by the Level 1 Trigger minus the missing Et calculated from Pythia particles in SUSY events, for each of the physical and trigger e ects considered. Each row of the table includes all the e ects considered in previous rows.... In PAGE 30: ...4 Integer scales { the nal comparison At this point all physical and trigger e ects have been taken into account except for the exact digital representation of the Level 1 Calorimeter Trigger system. Once again consider Table7 . For j j lt; 2:6, with only Pythia particles considered, the of the missing Et per crossing containing a SUSY event minus the true missing Et calculated from the particles in the SUSY event is 27.... In PAGE 31: ...28.0 GeV without the implementation of the Level 1 Trigger electronics. 9.5 Relative importance of e ects From Table7 it is clear which e ects are most important in determining the rates and resolutions of the missing Et trigger. For j j lt; 2:6, the largest e ects on the of the measured minus true missing Et for SUSY events come from the integer scales, the trigger tower cuto s, and the Gaussian detector resolution, in that order.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... Our robots will be unusual in that they are capable of changing shape over time if the dynamics demand this of them. Before we embark on a discussion of object- oriented physical design for robots within spaces, we present Table1 to illustrate how, through mappings from one discipline to another, di erent areas t into... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ...Monte Carlo Surface to Sur- face Particle Transport Copyright (C) October 1991, Computational Science Education Project Notation Key This section provides convenient lists of the notational conventions used throughout this chapter. Table1 lists the notation used for various physical and geometrical quantities, Table 2 details the usage of Greek symbols, and Table 3 summarizes the conventions for superscripts and subscripts. 1 Introduction In the following, we shall present the formulation for tracing particles from surfaces to surfaces inside an enclosure.... In PAGE 3: ...3 Table1 : Physical and Geometrical Quantities (cont.) R = random number, from a uniform distribution between 0 and 1 R = speedup ratio of scalar to vector execution times RD = di usely re ected photon RS = specularly re ected photon r = radius (m) S = arc length (m) S1, S2 = square of distance between the rst or second end point of a surface and the intersection point, X(1 or 2) ? XI 2 (m2) S12 = square of distance between end points of a surface, jX1 ? X2j2 (m2) S = scalar execution rate (MFLOP apos;s) s = path length (m) T = absolute temperature ( K) V = vector execution rate (MFLOP apos;s) X = vector point, fX; Y; Zg (m) XE = point of emission (m) XI = point of intersection (m) X; Y; Z = point in global Cartesian coordinates (m) Table 2: Greek Symbols = absorbance XL; YL = di erence in the X or Y direction between the end points of surface L (m) quot; = emittance = cone angle = re ectance = Stefan Boltzmann constant (W m?2 K?4) = azimuthal angle !... ..."

"... In PAGE 20: ... 5) We examined various e ects which could be responsible for the retarded radio emission (particle propagation e ects, di erent energies for the HXR-emitting and radio-emitting electrons, group velocity delays, collisional damping and wave growth times, radio wave scattering, radio wave ducting, light path di erences, time di erence between spacecraft orbit and ground-based radio station, clock errors). From all investigated e ects (see Table3 ), we nd the following accumu- lative upper limit for the expected HXR/radio delay: lt;190 ms for fundamental plasma emission, and lt;310 ms for harmonic plasma emission, opposed to the observed HXR/radio delay of (tR2 ? tX) = 270 150 ms. The values found for the upper limits favor harmonic emission, as expected from the argument of lesser free-free absorption.... ..."

"... In PAGE 17: ...System of two particles The simplest model in which both the constraints and the canonical group structure can be signi cantly exhibited is provided by a system of two particles. Table2 summarizes the quasi-SCT in this case. As anticipated at the end of Section 3, the next step in the construction of the nal basis consists in adapting the relative physical variables (~ ;~ ) not only to the SO(3) little group, but rather to a larger second-rank group.... ..."