Assessment ” to ensure consistency with the approved Summary for Policymakers (IPCC-XXVI/Doc.4) and presented to the Panel at its 36th Session. This document lists the changes necessary to ensure consistency between the full Report and the Summary for Policymakers, which was approved line-by-line by Working Group I and accepted by the Panel at the abovementioned Sessions. Before publication the Report will undergo final copyediting as well as any error correction as necessary, consistent with the IPCC Protocol for Addressing Possible Errors. Publication of the Report is foreseen in January 2014. Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of material on maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

Welcome to members and attendees

In [1], Eric Gauthier describes a replay attack where a man-in-the-middle captures Bluetooth communications and simultaneously uses a compromised Wireless LAN access point to trick a laptop into believing it has successfully authenticated with a 3G-WLAN network. The conditions necessary for this attack to succeed have been discussed on the SA3 mailing list. It

Abstract not found

50th session

The attached CR updates the specifications list according to the current (2001-06-10) status. CHANGE REQUEST

be sent by Gill, p.p. 3 Gill reported orally on the Registrar’s response. (References are to the Suss-Ex paper already copied to members.) 1a. Room costs for four events a year, plus Christmas party, will be raised by the providing building, but reimbursed by DARO. No time restrictions on this. All catering costs to be met by Suss-Ex. To be reviewed after a year. 1b. Room and catering costs of business meetings to continue be met by DARO. 2. Administration/Clerical. Up to 1.5 days per month (or equivalent over a period) staff time on tasks as listed to be provided by UoS; no individual yet identified. To be reviewed after a year. 3. The Registrar’s suggested procedure for Suss-Ex access, for mailing purposes, to names and addresses from the DARO

3 | � SES objective (art 1).To enhance current air traffic safety standards.To contribute to the sustainable development of the air transport system.To improve the overall performance of ATM and ANS for GAT in Europe, with a view to meeting the requirements of all airspace users

Chair1. Welcome, apologies, actions from previous meeting Chair/all2. Progress update: a. Status Report – for noting b. Duplication and overlap project – verbal update c. Regulatory gaps – discussion on approach to be undertaken 3. Environmental Objectives – discuss feedback received and consider next steps All 4. Legislative framework – verbal update Chair 5. Programme of Work period of validity review – discussion paper Chair/all Chair/all6. Other business a. Productivity Commission draft report on mineral and energy resource exploration: DMP alignment notes- for noting A. Suttonb. Panel out-of-session correspondence protocol- discuss Chair7. Next meeting Supporting Papers:

SCW, and the observers. Observers in attendance were representatives of the United States of America, France and the