• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 21 - 30 of 3,690
Next 10 →

Table 1. License types and corresponding factor values

in An Ontology-Centric Approach for Flexible Configuration and Pricing of Product Families
by Vincent Dedeban, Darijus Strasunskas
"... In PAGE 7: ... This license allows n copies of a licensed program to be accessed at any time. The factor values for each of the above discussed license type are illustrated in Table1 below. Table 1.... ..."

Table 2: Varying characteristics of open source licenses

in The Many Meanings of Open Source
by Cristina Gacek, Tony Lawrie, Budi Arief 2004
"... In PAGE 12: ...12 can become closed (proprietary) reflects the two main varying features of free and open source software. Table2 illustrates this with some of the more popular public licenses conforming to the OSD/FSF definitions. Viral licenses ensure that if any of the software code is used in other software developments then this will cause all of the software to come under the terms of that original license.... ..."
Cited by 31

Table 27. Detailed license data: universities

in unknown title
by unknown authors 1999
"... In PAGE 13: ...able 26. 1999 licenses: hospitals and universities.................................................................................................... 22 Table27 .... In PAGE 36: ... Table 26. 1999 licenses: hospitals and universities Number of new licenses Number of active licenses Number of institutions reporting active licenses Hospitals 14 56 5 Universities 218 1,109 28 Total 232 1,165 33 Table27 provides detailed information on new licenses executed in 1999 and total active licenses. One breakdown in the table is the number of exclusive versus non-exclusive licenses.... In PAGE 37: ... Table 12 showed that for 14/84 universities and 8/19 hospitals, the policy is that the sponsor has the first rights to license the IP. Table27 shows that of 109 new licenses with Canadian licensees, 39 were with sponsors of research contracts/participants in collaborative activities, 42 were with non-sponsors (parties not involved in generating the technology licensed) and the remaining 28 were unclassified. For confidentiality reasons, detailed information on hospital licenses is not available.... ..."
Cited by 2

Table 2: Varying characteristics of open source licenses

in The many meanings of Open Source
by Cristina Gacek, Tony Lawrie, Budi Arief
"... In PAGE 12: ...12 can become closed (proprietary) reflects the two main varying features of free and open source software. Table2 illustrates this with some of the more popular public licenses conforming to the OSD/FSF definitions. Viral licenses ensure that if any of the software code is used in other software developments then this will cause all of the software to come under the terms of that original license.... ..."

Table 2: Varying characteristics of open source licenses

in 1 Dependability Issues in Open Source Software DIRC Project Activity 5
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 32: ... Whether the software is viral or can become closed (proprietary) reflects the two main varying features of free and open source software. Table2 illustrates this with some of the more popular public licenses conforming to the OSD/FSF definitions. Viral licenses ensure that if any of the software code is used in other software developments then this will cause all of the software to come under the terms of that original license.... ..."

Table 4: UMTS license fees per year

in PREFACE
by Hong-vu Dang, Hong-vu Dang 2006
"... In PAGE 15: ... And what about next generations? The table gives an impression as if 151 Euros should be earned from each subscriber if everyone in the Netherlands would have a UMTS subscription. The table fails at showing the duration of the license, which is different for each country (CEPT, 2004), (European Commission, 2002): Country License start License end Duration United Kingdom 2001 2021 20 Germany 2000 2020 20 France 2001 2021 20 Italy 2002 2017 15 Netherlands 2002 2017 15 Austria 2000 2020 20 Switzerland 2001 2016 15 Table 3: start, end, and duration of UMTS licenses Table4 shows how much each country should earn from each subscriber for each year of the duration of the license if everyone in the country subscribes to UMTS in order to earn back the license fee. So if each person in the Netherlands has a UMTS subscription (and the population does not grow or shrink considerably in 15 years), the operators will earn the license fees back if they earn 12.... ..."

Table 5. Trawl catcher processor licenses for the GOA

in DEFINITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE BSAI/GOA
by Trawl Cvs, Goa Trawl Cvs, Llp Trawl, Recency Analysis 2007
"... In PAGE 9: ...able 4. Trawl catcher vessel licenses for the BSAI and GOA - 2000-2005.......................................................15 Table5 .... In PAGE 24: ... Trawl catcher vessel licenses for the BSAI and GOA - 2000-2005 LLP Area Alternative Harvest Area License Sector Total Licenses 2000-2005 Yes 2000-2005 No 2000-2005 Yes 2000-2005 No AI Alt 2 AI or BS ALL 48 42 6 42 6 AIAl 3 onlyAL 523222 BS Alt 2 AI or BS ALL 149 111 38 110 39 BS Alt 3 BS only ALL 149 111 38 110 39 CG Alt 2 CG or WG ALL 177 119 58 113 64 CG Alt 3 CG only ALL 177 91 86 81 96 WG Alt 2 CG or WG ALL 160 95 65 85 75 WG Alt 3 WG only ALL 160 78 82 64 96 Option 1 at least one day w/landing Option 2 at least two days w/landing Source: ADF amp;G fish ticket files and NMFS WPR landings data merged to an August 2007 RAM Division LLP file. Table5 shows the numbers of GOA catcher processor licenses meeting and not meeting the respective threshold, under the alternatives and options indicated. Table 5 includes CP license landings made while operating both as a catcher processor and in catcher vessel mode, an assumption utilized in all of the analyses contained in this report.... In PAGE 24: ... Table 5 shows the numbers of GOA catcher processor licenses meeting and not meeting the respective threshold, under the alternatives and options indicated. Table5 includes CP license landings made while operating both as a catcher processor and in catcher vessel mode, an assumption utilized in all of the analyses contained in this report. Table 5.... ..."

Table 25. Comparison of 1998 and 1999 licenses: universities

in unknown title
by unknown authors 1999
"... In PAGE 13: ...able 24. IP promotion ............................................................................................................................................... 21 Table25 .... In PAGE 36: ... Due to better reporting, the new 1999 total is 1,109 active licenses. Table25 gives the complete details. Table 25.... ..."
Cited by 2

Table 4: State Licensing Renewal Policies State

in Mobility in an Aging America: Design, Licensing, and Alternative Transportation Options
by Jason Bittner Douglas, J. Douglas Long, Lucas Szylow
"... In PAGE 11: ... These laws have come despite the position stated by the American Asso- ciation of Retired Persons (AARP) that age based testing is discriminatory and arbitrary (AARP, 1995). Table4 illustrates the variation in licensing and renewal requirements for older drivers in ... In PAGE 15: ... Table4 shows that 16 states have specific accelerated license renewal provisions for older drivers. Accelerated renewal procedures for drivers older than a specific age, usually 65 or 70, re- quire in-person license renewal rather than electronic or mail renewal.... In PAGE 15: ...) An additional issue to consider when assessing the significance of accelerated renewal pro- visions is variations in license renewal cycles for all drivers. As indicated Table4 , the length of li- cense renewal for the general population ranges from 2 to 12 years. Thus, even though a particular state (Arizona, for example) has an accelerated renewal period for older drivers, the older drivers in a state that has a shorter renewal period for all drivers (Iowa, for example) will be forced to enter the renewal process much sooner.... ..."

Table 3 Number and Term of License, 2002

in Preliminary Draft -- Comments and Suggestions Welcomed Version 1.5
by Douglas A. Galbi, Senior Economist, Revolutionary Ideas For
"... In PAGE 18: ... The number of administratively recognized radio services has approximately tripled, from 30 in 1932 to 106 in the year 2002.1 Table3 shows the number of U.... In PAGE 18: ...umber of U.S. radio licenses in April, 2002. Rather than organizing the data according to the many administratively defined radio service categories, Table3 summarizes license counts using the categories in Table 1, plus new categories for new land mobile, FM radio, and television services. Over the past seventy years the number of radio licenses increased about fifty-fold.... In PAGE 113: ...ervices. See http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/radioservices.html In Table3 , the land (mobile) category combines: Cellular (CL) GMRS - General Mobile Radio Services (ZA) Land Mobile Commercial (LC) Land Mobile Private (LP) Paging (PG) Personal Communication Services - PCS (PC) The land (fixed) category combines: Coast and Ground (CG) Microwave (MW) The other categories in Table 3 map directly to associated headings in the radio services list. Broadcast station totals are from FCC News Release, Broadcast Station Totals as of September 30, 2001, (rel.... In PAGE 113: ...ervices. See http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/radioservices.html In Table 3, the land (mobile) category combines: Cellular (CL) GMRS - General Mobile Radio Services (ZA) Land Mobile Commercial (LC) Land Mobile Private (LP) Paging (PG) Personal Communication Services - PCS (PC) The land (fixed) category combines: Coast and Ground (CG) Microwave (MW) The other categories in Table3 map directly to associated headings in the radio services list. Broadcast station totals are from FCC News Release, Broadcast Station Totals as of September 30, 2001, (rel.... ..."
Next 10 →
Results 21 - 30 of 3,690
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University