• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Elections Can be Manipulated Often

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cs.huji.ac.il]
  • [www-2.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.ratio.huji.ac.il]
  • [www.dklevine.com]
  • [www.dklevine.com]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Ehud Friedgut , Gil Kalai , Noam Nisan
Citations:66 - 1 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Friedgut_electionscan,
    author = {Ehud Friedgut and Gil Kalai and Noam Nisan},
    title = {Elections Can be Manipulated Often },
    year = {}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem states that every non-trivial voting method between at least 3 alternatives can be strategically manipulated. We prove a quantitative version of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem: a random manipulation by a single random voter will succeed with non-negligible probability for every neutral voting method between 3 alternatives that is far from being a dictatorship.

Keyphrases

single random voter    neutral voting method    non-negligible probability    non-trivial voting method    quantitative version    gibbard-satterthwaite theorem    random manipulation    gibbard-satterthwaite theorem state   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University