DMCA
Probabilistic Mental Models: A Brunswikian Theory of Confidence (1991)
Cached
Download Links
| Venue: | Psychological Review |
| Citations: | 270 - 29 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Gigerenzer91probabilisticmental,
author = {Gerd Gigerenzer and Ulrich Hoffrage and Heinz Kleinbölting},
title = {Probabilistic Mental Models: A Brunswikian Theory of Confidence},
journal = {Psychological Review},
year = {1991},
volume = {98},
pages = {506--528}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
Research on people’s confidence in their general knowledge has to date produced two fairly stable effects, many inconsistent results, and no comprehensive theory. We propose such a comprehensive framework, the theory of probabilistic mental models (PMM theory). The theory (a) explains both the overconfidence effect (mean confidence is higher than percentage of answers correct) and the hard-easy effect (overconfidence increases with item difficulty) reported in the literature and (b) predicts conditions under which both effects appear, disappear, or invert. In addition, (c) it predicts a new phenomenon, the confidence-frequency effect, a systematic difference between a judgment of confidence in a single event (i.e., that any given answer is correct) and a judgment of the frequency of correct answers in the long run. Two experiments are reported that support PMM theory by confirming these predictions, and several apparent anomalies reported in the literature are explained and integrated into the present framework. Do people think they know more than they really do? In the last 15 years, cognitive psychologists have amassed a large and apparently damning body of experimental evidence on overconfidence in knowledge, evidence that is in turn part of an even larger and more damning literature on socalled cognitive biases. The cognitive bias research claims that people are naturally prone to making mistakes in reasoning and memory, including the mistake of overestimating their knowledge.
Keyphrases
probabilistic mental model brunswikian theory general knowledge comprehensive framework systematic difference overconfidence increase socalled cognitive bias mean confidence hard-easy effect confidence-frequency effect stable effect people confidence damning literature several apparent anomaly many inconsistent result present framework long run experimental evidence item difficulty comprehensive theory correct answer turn part pmm theory single event cognitive psychologist support pmm theory cognitive bias research overconfidence effect new phenomenon
