Results 1 -
8 of
8
HOW TO REVIEW A PAPER
"... Most scientists acquire their training in manuscript review not through instruction but by actually doing it. Formal training in manuscript analysis is rarely, if ever, provided. Editors usually choose reviewers because of expertise in a given subject area and availability. If an individual repeated ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 6 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Most scientists acquire their training in manuscript review not through instruction but by actually doing it. Formal training in manuscript analysis is rarely, if ever, provided. Editors usually choose reviewers because of expertise in a given subject area and availability. If an individual repeatedly submits bad reviews, it is likely that that person will not be asked to review a manuscript again. Being invited to review a manuscript is an honor, not only because you are being recognized for your eminence in a particular area of research but also because of the responsibility and service you provide to the journal and scientific community. The purpose of this article is to define how best to peer review an article. We will stipulate several principles of peer review and discuss some of the main elements of a good manuscript review, the basic responsibilities of a reviewer, and the rewards and responsibilities that accompany this process. Proper reviewer conduct is essential for making the peer review process valuable and the journal trustworthy.
Journal publishes Manuscript of following types:
"... Conclusions, Acknowledgements and References. Manuscript should not be exceeding 15 typewritten pages including tables and figures. Short communications: Short communications presenting important new finding and cannot be elaborated as full research paper can be communicated whose average length is ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Conclusions, Acknowledgements and References. Manuscript should not be exceeding 15 typewritten pages including tables and figures. Short communications: Short communications presenting important new finding and cannot be elaborated as full research paper can be communicated whose average length is not more than 6 type-written pages (Approx-2500 words), including abstract and title page. Invited reviews: Reviews on special topics of current interest in Pharmaceutical Technology are welcomed. Length of review article should be same as that of original research article. Opinions & Perspectives: Opinions & perspectives on topics of current and future interest by renowned scientist, researchers are welcomed.
Research Article
"... ISSN: 0974-6943 Available online through www.jpronline.info *Corresponding author. ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
ISSN: 0974-6943 Available online through www.jpronline.info *Corresponding author.
A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript [PDF] [Full Text] [Abstract]
, 2004
"... You might find this additional information useful... 6 articles, 3 of which you can access free at: This article cites ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
You might find this additional information useful... 6 articles, 3 of which you can access free at: This article cites
A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript
, 2006
"... You might find this additional information useful... 7 articles, 3 of which you can access free at: This article cites ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
You might find this additional information useful... 7 articles, 3 of which you can access free at: This article cites
