Results 1 -
3 of
3
Thou shalt is not you will
, 2014
"... Abstract: In this paper we discuss some reasons why temporal logic might not be suitable to model real life norms. To show this, we present a novel deontic logic contrary-to-duty/derived permission paradox based on the interaction of obligations, permissions and contrary-to-duty obligations. The pa ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 4 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract: In this paper we discuss some reasons why temporal logic might not be suitable to model real life norms. To show this, we present a novel deontic logic contrary-to-duty/derived permission paradox based on the interaction of obligations, permissions and contrary-to-duty obligations. The paradox is inspired by real life norms.
Semantics for Modelling Reason-based Preferences
"... Abstract. In [13] the authors developed a logical system based on the definition of a new non-classical connective ⊗ originally capturing the notion of reparative obligation. The operator ⊗ and the system were proved to be appropriate for rather handling well-known contrary-to-duty paradoxes. Later ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. In [13] the authors developed a logical system based on the definition of a new non-classical connective ⊗ originally capturing the notion of reparative obligation. The operator ⊗ and the system were proved to be appropriate for rather handling well-known contrary-to-duty paradoxes. Later on, a suitable model-theoretic possible-world semantics has been developed [4, 5]. In this paper we show how a version of this semantics can be used to develop a sound and complete logic of preference and offer a suitable possible-world semantics. The semantics is a sequence-based non-normal one extending and generalising semantics for classical modal logics. 1
unknown title
, 1833
"... Abstract: In this paper we discuss some reasons why temporal logic might not be suitable to model real life norms. To show this, we present a novel deontic logic contrary-to-duty/derived permission paradox based on the interaction of obligations, permissions and contrary-to-duty obligations. The par ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract: In this paper we discuss some reasons why temporal logic might not be suitable to model real life norms. To show this, we present a novel deontic logic contrary-to-duty/derived permission paradox based on the interaction of obligations, permissions and contrary-to-duty obligations. The paradox is inspired by real life norms.