• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions (1998)

by S K Parker
Venue:Journal of Applied Psychology
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 10 of 89
Next 10 →

Positive Psychological Capital: Measurement and Relationship with Performance and Satisfaction.Personnel

by Fred Luthans, Bruce, J. Avolio, James B. Avey, Steven M. Norman - Psychology , 2007
"... Two studies were conducted to analyze how hope, resilience, optimism, and efficacy individually and as a composite higher-order factor pre-dicted work performance and satisfaction. Results from Study 1 provided psychometric support for a new survey measure designed to assess each of these 4 facets, ..."
Abstract - Cited by 125 (14 self) - Add to MetaCart
Two studies were conducted to analyze how hope, resilience, optimism, and efficacy individually and as a composite higher-order factor pre-dicted work performance and satisfaction. Results from Study 1 provided psychometric support for a new survey measure designed to assess each of these 4 facets, as well as a composite factor. Study 2 results indi-cated a significant positive relationship regarding the composite of these 4 facets with performance and satisfaction. Results from Study 2 also indicated that the composite factor may be a better predictor of per-formance and satisfaction than the 4 individual facets. Limitations and practical implications conclude the article. In a special issue of the American Psychologist, Sheldon and King (2001, p. 216) point out that “Positive psychology revisits the ‘aver-age person ’ with an interest in finding out what works, what is right, and what is improving. ” Like positive psychology, which does not claim to have discovered the importance of positivity (e.g., see Peterson, 2006), the recently emerging positive organizational behavior field recognizes that much of the early history (e.g., Herzberg, 1966; Maslow, 1954; McGregor, 1960) and contemporary theories and research (e.g., job satisfaction, organizational commitment, positive affectivity, core self-evaluations, organizational citizenship, intrinsic motivation, humor, self-determination, organizational justice, among others) are positively oriented. Nevertheless, analogous to, and drawing from, the positive psy-chology literature, the term positive organizational behavior is intended to
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...four scales that were determined to best meet these criteria were (a) hope (Snyder et al., 1996); (b) resilience (Wagnild & Young, 1993); (c) optimism (Scheier & Carver, 1985); and (d) self-efficacy (=-=Parker, 1998-=-). 554 PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY Each of these four selected scales have considerable psychometric support across multiple samples in prior research and have also been verified in workplace studies by them...

Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions

by Hsiu-fen Lin - Journal of Information Science , 2007
"... On behalf of: ..."
Abstract - Cited by 61 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
On behalf of:
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...providing useful feedback to improve employee knowledge self-efficacy. Previous work on role breadth self-efficacy has identified several methods of enhancing the knowledge self-efficacy of employees =-=[80]-=-. A highly self-efficacious staff can be established by recruiting and selecting employees who are proactive, and who have high cognitive aptitude and selfesteem and are intrinsically motivated. Addit...

Cultivate Self-Efficacy for Personal and Organizational Effectiveness

by Albert Bandura
"... how long to persevere in the face of difficulties (Bandura, 1997; Locke & Latham, 1990). When faced with obstacles, setbacks, and failures, those who doubt their capabilities slacken their efforts, give up, or settle for mediocre solutions. Those who have a strong belief in their capabilities re ..."
Abstract - Cited by 59 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
how long to persevere in the face of difficulties (Bandura, 1997; Locke & Latham, 1990). When faced with obstacles, setbacks, and failures, those who doubt their capabilities slacken their efforts, give up, or settle for mediocre solutions. Those who have a strong belief in their capabilities redouble their effort to master the challenges. Perceived efficacy, similarly, plays an influential role in the incentive and disincentive potential of outcome expectations. The outcomes people anticipate depend largely on their beliefs of how well they can perform in given situations. Those of high efficacy expect to gain favorable outcomes through good performance, whereas those who expect poor performances of themselves conjure up negative outcomes. In theories of motivation founded on the incentives of cognized outcomes, such as expectancy-value theories, motivation is governed by the expectation that a given behavior will produce certain outcomes and the value placed on those outcomes. This t
(Show Context)

Citation Context

..., 1995). Other organizational practices, such as job enrichment and mutually supportive communication, also build employees’ perceived efficacy to take on broader functions and a proactive work role=-= (Parker, 1998-=-). Self-efficacy theory provides a conceptual framework within which to study the determinants in effective work design and the mechanisms through which they enhance organizational functioning. Workli...

Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression research articles: β is not enough.

by T Courville, B Thompson - Educational and Psychological Measurement, , 2001
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 52 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

Unwrapping the organizational entry process: Disentangling multiple antecedents and their pathways to adjustment

by John D. Kammeyer-mueller, Connie R. Wanberg - Journal of Applied Psychology , 2003
"... This 4-wave longitudinal study of newcomers in 7 organizations examined preentry knowledge, proactive personality, and socialization influences as antecedents of both proximal (task mastery, role clarity, work group integration, and political knowledge) and distal (organizational commitment, work wi ..."
Abstract - Cited by 45 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
This 4-wave longitudinal study of newcomers in 7 organizations examined preentry knowledge, proactive personality, and socialization influences as antecedents of both proximal (task mastery, role clarity, work group integration, and political knowledge) and distal (organizational commitment, work withdrawal, and turnover) indicators of newcomer adjustment. Results suggest that preentry knowledge, proactive personality, and socialization influences from the organization, supervisors, and coworkers are independently related to proximal adjustment outcomes, consistent with a theoretical framework highlighting distinct dimensions of organizational and work task adjustment. The proximal adjustment outcomes partially mediated most of the relationships between the antecedents of adjustment and organizational commitment, work withdrawal, and turnover. The period of early entry is one of the most critical phases of organizational life. During this time newcomers determine what their new organization is like and decide whether they “fit in.” Many researchers have proposed that newcomers ’ initial attitudes strongly influence subsequent attitudes and behavior (e.g., Mowday, Porter, & Steers, 1982; Wanous, 1992). Evidence that work
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...their environment, and seek out information (Bateman & Crant, 1993; Crant, 2000). Studies have related proactive personality to job performance (Crant, 1995), communication and participation at work (=-=Parker, 1998-=-), and career success (Seibert, Crant, & Kraimer, 1999). The latter relationship was partially mediated by political knowledge, personal development, and innovation (Seibert et al., 2001). Crant (2000...

The Effectiveness of Managerial Leadership Development Programs: A Meta-Analysis

by Doris B. Collins, Elwood F. Holton Iii
"... were integrated via meta-analytic techniques to determine the effectiveness of interventions in their enhancement of performance, knowledge, and expertise at the individual, team or group, or organizational level. The studies were separated by research design, with the outcome measure of the interve ..."
Abstract - Cited by 34 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
were integrated via meta-analytic techniques to determine the effectiveness of interventions in their enhancement of performance, knowledge, and expertise at the individual, team or group, or organizational level. The studies were separated by research design, with the outcome measure of the intervention as the unit of analysis. The effect size for knowledge outcomes ranged from.96 to 1.37; expertise outcomes from.35 to 1.01; and system outcomes averaged.39. Interventions with knowledge outcomes were found to be more effective than in the Burke and Day (1986) meta-analysis, with the most effective interventions using a single group pretest-posttest research design. Methodological and conceptual differences in Burke and Day’s meta-analysis on the effectiveness of managerial training make historical comparisons risky. The data suggest that practitioners can attain substantial improvements in both knowledge and skills if sufficient front-end analysis is conducted to assure that the right development is offered to the right leaders. Many organizations are concerned about the leadership inadequacies of their employees and are committed to education and training to develop managers’ skills, perspectives, and competencies (Conger & Benjamin, 1999). Leadership development literature indicates that significant financial payoffs are found among companies that emphasize training and development (Huselid, 1995;

Experimental analysis of a web-based training intervention to develop positive psychological capital. Academy of Management Learning

by Fred Luthans, James B. Avey, Jaime L. Patera - and Education , 2008
"... Psychological capital with components of hope, self-efficacy, optimism, and resiliency has recently emerged as a core construct in taking positive psychology to the workplace. A distinguishing feature is that it is “state-like ” and thus open to development. We analyze whether such psychological cap ..."
Abstract - Cited by 33 (4 self) - Add to MetaCart
Psychological capital with components of hope, self-efficacy, optimism, and resiliency has recently emerged as a core construct in taking positive psychology to the workplace. A distinguishing feature is that it is “state-like ” and thus open to development. We analyze whether such psychological capital can be developed through a highly focused, 2-hour web-based training intervention. Using a pretest, posttest experimental design (n 187 randomly assigned to the treatment group and n 177 to the control group), we found support that psychological capital can be developed by such a training intervention. Although the importance of positivity has been given attention through the years, only recently has it been proposed as a new (or at least renewed) lens to focus study on organizational behavior
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...were adapted for the workplace from the following standard scales: (1.) Hope (Snyder et al., 1996); (2.) Resilience (Wagnild & Young, 1993); (3.) Optimism (Scheier & Carver, 1985); and (4.) Efficacy (=-=Parker, 1998-=-). The entire 24-item PCQ is published in Luthans, Youssef, and Avolio (2007: 237–238). Some sample items for each subscale include the following: “I feel confident helping to set targets/goals in my ...

Implicating Trust in the Innovation Process

by Chris Clegg, Kerrie Unsworth, Olga Epitropaki, Giselle Parker - Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology , 2002
"... The work described in this document was performed as part of the UTP (University Technology Partnership) for Design. The UTP is a collaboration between RollsRoyce, BAE SYSTEMS and the Universities of Cambridge, Sheffield and Southampton. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this repor ..."
Abstract - Cited by 30 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
The work described in this document was performed as part of the UTP (University Technology Partnership) for Design. The UTP is a collaboration between RollsRoyce, BAE SYSTEMS and the Universities of Cambridge, Sheffield and Southampton. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this report are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of any other organization involved in the partnership. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, whether electronic, mechanical, photocopying or recording or otherwise ; nor stored in any information retrieval system of any kind ; not used for tendering or manufacturing ; nor communicated to any person, without prior written permission of the copyright owner. Ó BAE SYSTEMS plc, RollsRoyce plc. All Rights Reserved. 2 In this paper we describe the development of two new measures of innovation trust, ‘trust that heard ’ and ‘trust that benefit’. We report the findings from their use in a survey of design engineers in two large aerospace companies. We test a range of hypotheses covering different plausible roles for trust and confirm a ‘main effects ’ model, whereby the variables predict the number of ideas suggested and the number of ideas implemented. In addition, we replicate earlier findings by Axtell et al. (2000), namely
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...predict different parts of the innovation process. Specifically we included thinking style (a personal characteristic – see Jabri, 1990; Scott & Bruce, 1994), role breadth (a job characteristic – see =-=Parker, 1998-=-), and two organisational variables, namely leadership style (Dansereau, Graen, & Haga, 1975; Scott & Bruce, 1994), and organizational support for innovation (Anderson & West, 1997; Scott & Bruce, 199...

Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation

by Sharon K. Parker, Uta K. Bindl, Karoline Strauss - Journal of Management , 2010
"... Being proactive is about making things happen, anticipating and preventing problems, and seiz-ing opportunities. It involves self-initiated efforts to bring about change in the work environment and/or oneself to achieve a different future. The authors develop existing perspectives on this topic by i ..."
Abstract - Cited by 23 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Being proactive is about making things happen, anticipating and preventing problems, and seiz-ing opportunities. It involves self-initiated efforts to bring about change in the work environment and/or oneself to achieve a different future. The authors develop existing perspectives on this topic by identifying proactivity as a goal-driven process involving both the setting of a proactive goal (proactive goal generation) and striving to achieve that proactive goal (proactive goal striv-ing). The authors identify a range of proactive goals that individuals can pursue in organizations. These vary on two dimensions: the future they aim to bring about (achieving a better personal fit within one’s work environment, improving the organization’s internal functioning, or enhancing the organization’s strategic fit with its environment) and whether the self or situation is being changed. The authors then identify “can do, ” “reason to, ” and “energized to ” motivational states that prompt proactive goal generation and sustain goal striving. Can do motivation arises from perceptions of self-efficacy, control, and (low) cost. Reason to motivation relates to why someone is proactive, including reasons flowing from intrinsic, integrated, and identified motiva-tion. Energized to motivation refers to activated positive affective states that prompt proactive goal processes. The authors suggest more distal antecedents, including individual differences
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...acy isspositively linked with proactive job search (Kanfer et al., 2001). Similarly, judgments of thesperceived capability to go over and beyond the prescribed job tasks (“role-breadth selfefficacy”; =-=Parker, 1998-=-) predict proactive behaviors such as the suggestion of improvementss(Axtell, Holman, Unsworth, Wall, & Waterson, 2000) and proactive problem solving andsidea implementation (Parker, Williams, et al.,...

Working in the Sky: A Diary Study on Work Engagement Among Flight Attendants

by Despoina Xanthopoulou, Arnold B. Baker, Ellen Heuven, Evangelia Demerouti, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Despoina Xanthopoulou, Arnold B. Bakker
"... This study aims to gain insight in the motivational process of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model by examining whether daily fluctuations in colleague support (i.e., a typical job resource) predict day-levels of job performance through self-efficacy and work engagement. Forty-four flight attenda ..."
Abstract - Cited by 15 (5 self) - Add to MetaCart
This study aims to gain insight in the motivational process of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model by examining whether daily fluctuations in colleague support (i.e., a typical job resource) predict day-levels of job performance through self-efficacy and work engagement. Forty-four flight attendants filled in a questionnaire and a diary booklet before and after consecutive flights to three intercontinental destinations. Results of multilevel analyses revealed that colleague support had unique positive effects on self-efficacy and work engagement. Self-efficacy did not mediate the relationship between support and engagement, but work engagement mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and (in-role and extra-role) performance. In addition, colleague support had an indirect effect on in-role performance through work engagement. These findings shed light on the motivational process as outlined in the JD-R model, and suggest that colleague support is an important job resource for flight attendants helping them reach their work-related goals.
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University