• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

Aronszajn trees and the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis (2010)

by Itay Neeman
Venue:J. of Mathematical Logic
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 10 of 13
Next 10 →

FORCING WITH SEQUENCES OF MODELS OF TWO TYPES

by Itay Neeman
"... Abstract. We present an approach to forcing with finite sequences of models that uses models of two types. This approach builds on earlier work of Friedman and Mitchell on forcing to add clubs in cardinals larger than ℵ1, with finite conditions. We use the two-type approach to give a new proof of th ..."
Abstract - Cited by 14 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We present an approach to forcing with finite sequences of models that uses models of two types. This approach builds on earlier work of Friedman and Mitchell on forcing to add clubs in cardinals larger than ℵ1, with finite conditions. We use the two-type approach to give a new proof of the consistency of the proper forcing axiom. The new proof uses a finite support forcing, as opposed to the countable support iteration in the standard proof. The distinction is important since a proof using finite supports is more amenable to generalizations to cardinals greater than ℵ1.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

... in arguments that deal with the tree property. One example involves models of the tree property at successors of singular cardinals together with failure of the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis. Neeman =-=[8]-=- produced such models for large singular cardinals. Sinapova [10] then produced such models for ℵ ω 2. Passing from Neeman’s construction to Sinapova’s requires several collapses, that ultimately will...

Diagonal Prikry extensions

by James Cummings, Matthew Foreman - J. Symbolic Logic
"... It is a well-known phenomenon in set theory that problems in infinite combinatorics involving singular cardinals and their successors tend to be harder than the parallel problems for regular cardinals. Examples include the behaviour of cardinal exponentiation, the extent ..."
Abstract - Cited by 13 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
It is a well-known phenomenon in set theory that problems in infinite combinatorics involving singular cardinals and their successors tend to be harder than the parallel problems for regular cardinals. Examples include the behaviour of cardinal exponentiation, the extent
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...akes a supercompact cardinal κ into a singular cardinal of uncountable cofinality, and showed that in her model there are cofinal sets carrying a non-good scale and a very good scale. (2) Itay Neeman =-=[23]-=- used a variant of the Gitik-Sharon construction to produce a model in which the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis fails at a singular cardinal κ of cofinality ω, and κ + has the tree property. This model...

THE TREE PROPERTY UP TO ℵω+1

by Itay Neeman
"... Abstract. Assuming ω supercompact cardinals we force to obtain a model where the tree property holds both at ℵω+1, and at ℵn for all 2 ≤ n < ω. A model with the former was obtainedby Magidor–Shelahfrom a huge cardinaland ω supercompactcardinals above it, and recently by Sinapova from ω supercompa ..."
Abstract - Cited by 4 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Assuming ω supercompact cardinals we force to obtain a model where the tree property holds both at ℵω+1, and at ℵn for all 2 ≤ n &lt; ω. A model with the former was obtainedby Magidor–Shelahfrom a huge cardinaland ω supercompactcardinals above it, and recently by Sinapova from ω supercompact cardinals. A model with the latter was obtained by Cummings–Foreman from ω supercompact cardinals. Our model, where the two hold simultaneously, is another step toward the goal of obtaining the tree property on increasingly large intervals of successor cardinals. MSC-2010: 03E35, 03E05, 03E55.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...roperty at ℵω+2 implies that 2 ℵω ≥ ℵω+2, and it is not known if even this is consistent with the tree property at ℵω+1. This particular question has a long history, and we refer the reader to Neeman =-=[6]-=- and Sinapova [7] for positive answers at some singular strong limit cardinal κ and at ℵ ω 2 respectively. Our proof that the tree property can hold at all successor cardinals in the interval [ℵ2,ℵω+1...

THE TREE PROPERTY AT ℵω+1

by Dima Sinapova
"... Abstract. We show that given ω many supercompact cardinals, there is a generic extension in which there are no Aronszajn trees at ℵω+1. This is an improvement of the large cardinal assumptions. The previous hypothesis was a huge cardinal and ω many supercompact cardinals above it, in Magidor-Shelah ..."
Abstract - Cited by 3 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We show that given ω many supercompact cardinals, there is a generic extension in which there are no Aronszajn trees at ℵω+1. This is an improvement of the large cardinal assumptions. The previous hypothesis was a huge cardinal and ω many supercompact cardinals above it, in Magidor-Shelah [7]. 1.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...cardinal hypothesis. We present a proof for the consistency of the tree property at ℵω+1 starting only from ω many supercompact cardinals. Our construction is motivated by Gitik-Sharon [5] and Neeman =-=[8]-=-. In particular, we will show the following theorem: Theorem 1. Suppose that in V , 〈κn | n < ω〉 is an increasing sequence of supercompact cardinals and GCH holds. Then there is a generic extension in...

The tree property and the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis at ℵ ω 2

by Dima Sinapova - J. Symbolic Logic
"... Abstract. We show that given ω many supercompact cardinals, there is a generic extension in which the tree property holds at ℵ ω 2 +1 and the SCH fails at ℵ ω 2. 1. ..."
Abstract - Cited by 3 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We show that given ω many supercompact cardinals, there is a generic extension in which the tree property holds at ℵ ω 2 +1 and the SCH fails at ℵ ω 2. 1.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...owed the consistency of the failure of SCH at a singular cardinal κ together with the non-existence of special κ +-Aronszajn trees. They also pushed down their result to κ = ℵω2. Then in 2009, Neeman =-=[10]-=- obtained the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis at some large singular cardinal κ, together with the full tree property at κ +. It remained open whether this construction can be pushed down ...

COMBINATORICS AT ℵω

by Dima Sinapova, Spencer Unger
"... Abstract. We construct a model in which the singular cardinal hypothesis fails at ℵω. We use characterizations of genericity to show the existence of a projection between different Prikry type forcings. 1. ..."
Abstract - Cited by 2 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We construct a model in which the singular cardinal hypothesis fails at ℵω. We use characterizations of genericity to show the existence of a projection between different Prikry type forcings. 1.

SINGULAR CARDINALS: FROM HAUSDORFF’S GAPS TO SHELAH’S PCF THEORY

by Menachem Kojman
"... The mathematical subject of singular cardinals is young and many of the mathematicians who made important contributions to it are still active. This makes writing a history of singular cardinals a somewhat riskier mission than writing the history of, say, Babylonian arithmetic. Yet exactly the discu ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
The mathematical subject of singular cardinals is young and many of the mathematicians who made important contributions to it are still active. This makes writing a history of singular cardinals a somewhat riskier mission than writing the history of, say, Babylonian arithmetic. Yet exactly the discussions with some of the people who created the 20th century history of singular cardinals made the writing of this article fascinating. I am indebted to Moti Gitik, Ronald Jensen, István Juhász, Menachem Magidor and Saharon Shelah for the time and effort they spent on helping me understand the development of the subject and for many illuminations they provided. A lot of what I thought about the history of singular cardinals had to change as a result of these discussions. Special thanks are due to István Juhász, for his patient reading for me from the Russian text of Alexandrov and Urysohn’s Memoirs, to Salma Kuhlmann, who directed me to the definition of singular cardinals in Hausdorff’s writing, and to Stefan Geschke, who helped me with the German texts I needed to read and

DIAGONAL EXTENDER BASED PRIKRY FORCING

by unknown authors
"... Abstract. We present a new forcing notion combining diagonal supercompact Prikry focing with interleaved extender based forcing. In the final model the singular cardinal hypothesis fails at κ and GCH holds below κ. Moreover we define a scale at κ, which has a stationary set of bad points in the grou ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We present a new forcing notion combining diagonal supercompact Prikry focing with interleaved extender based forcing. In the final model the singular cardinal hypothesis fails at κ and GCH holds below κ. Moreover we define a scale at κ, which has a stationary set of bad points in the ground model. 1.

THE TREE PROPERTY AND THE FAILURE OF SCH AT UNCOUNTABLE COFINALITY

by Dima Sinapova
"... Abstract. Given a regular cardinal λ and λ many supercompact cardinals, we describe a type of forcing such that in the generic extension there is a cardinal κ with cofinality λ, the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at κ fails, and the tree property holds at κ +. 1. ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Given a regular cardinal λ and λ many supercompact cardinals, we describe a type of forcing such that in the generic extension there is a cardinal κ with cofinality λ, the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at κ fails, and the tree property holds at κ +. 1.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...ngular cardinal arithmetic. The tree property at κ + states that there are no Aronszajn trees at κ + i.e. that every κ + -tree has an unbounded branch. Recently an old question was answered by Neeman =-=[5]-=- in the negative: whether failure of SCH implies the existence of an Aronszajn tree. Previously the only known way to establish the tree property at a successor of a singular cardinal was due to Magid...

TWO RESULTS IN COMBINATORIAL SET THEORY

by James Cummings, James Cummings
"... ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...are proved using forcing posets which singularise κ and collapse κ + : (a) Gitik and Sharon [8] showed that consistently there is κ strong limit of cofinality ω, 2 κ > κ + and □ ∗ κ fails. (b) Neeman =-=[10]-=- showed that consistently there is κ strong limit of cofinality ω, 2 κ > κ + and κ + has the tree property. To state sharper results about square principles, we recall a hierarchy of principles define...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University