Results 1 -
4 of
4
EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TECHNOLOGY IN OUR SCHOOLS ACT Policy Report
"... ..."
(Show Context)
Supervisors
, 2007
"... Internet and multimedia for teaching and learning A case study of using web-based services in higher education ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Internet and multimedia for teaching and learning A case study of using web-based services in higher education
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED AND TRADITIONAL CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENTS
, 2014
"... The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which student engagement and academic achievement were associated with exposure to different modes of instruction; specifically technology enhanced environments vs. traditional FACE-TO-FACE environments. A cross-sectional survey was conducted ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which student engagement and academic achievement were associated with exposure to different modes of instruction; specifically technology enhanced environments vs. traditional FACE-TO-FACE environments. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in October 2013 at a local community college in Charlotte, NC. The Class Level Survey of Student Engagement (CLASSE) was administered to collect valid and reliable variables relating to student engagement from a convenience sample consisting of 80 volunteers enrolled in the Medical Science and Science divisions. Other variables were collected using the Demographic Questionnaire, and the Instructional Environment Questionnaire. The community college also provided secondary archival data consisting of the frequency distributions of grades achieved by 4102 students in October 2013. The cross-sectional survey revealed that students may be more engaged by technology than by traditional FACE-TO-FACE instruction; however, educational practices such as preparing for classes, taking notes, outside reading, and doing homework, with low levels of absence were relatively more important predictors of student engagement than the use of technology. Analysis