• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

Is Full Compliance Possible? Conditions for Shirking with Imperfect Monitoring and Continuous Action Spaces (2006)

by Jenna Bednar
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 7 of 7

Federalism as a Public Good

by Jenna Bednar
"... Abstract. This paper suggests that stabilizing federalism is like solving a public good provision problem. It reviews results in the public good provision literature that are relevant for federalism, and discusses the implications of these results for the institutional design of federalism. ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This paper suggests that stabilizing federalism is like solving a public good provision problem. It reviews results in the public good provision literature that are relevant for federalism, and discusses the implications of these results for the institutional design of federalism.

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

by Nudging Federalism Towards, Jenna Bednar, Jenna Bednar , 2011
"... Publication details, including instructions for authors ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Publication details, including instructions for authors
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...the EPA. 16 This theory is developed in more detail in Bednar (2009, chs 6 and 7). 17 This problem is general to almost all problems that require collective action with individual self-sacrifice (see =-=Bednar, 2006-=-). 18 See Bednar (2009, ch. 7) and Page (2010) for detailed discussions of independence and robustness. 19 Crutchfield (2009) uses this phrase to describe the underlying vulnerability of many complex ...

Subsidiarity and Robustness: Building the Adaptive Efficiency of Federal Systems

by Jenna Bednar , 2013
"... Subsidiarity—a systemic predilection for locating authority at the most local level feasible—has long been admired for its ability to protect localized, diverse interests from the tyranny of a national majority. In this article I suggest a novel benefit of subsidiarity: it boosts the adaptive effici ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Subsidiarity—a systemic predilection for locating authority at the most local level feasible—has long been admired for its ability to protect localized, diverse interests from the tyranny of a national majority. In this article I suggest a novel benefit of subsidiarity: it boosts the adaptive efficiency of federal systems. To remain relevant, federal systems must adapt to meet changing circumstances. The process of adaptation involves both pushing federalism’s boundaries in search of improved national-state balance, and selecting beneficial changes and rejecting harmful ones, a job most efficiently conducted by a set of diverse, complementary safeguards. By drawing a distinction between policy subsidiarity and safeguard subsidiarity, I describe how each form of subsidiarity contributes to the process of constitutional adaptation and federal system robustness. Subsidiarity is, in a very real sense, the soul of federalism. Subsidiarity
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...racterize the way that the components interact to generate positive or negative feedback. Given the collective action dilemma inherent to federations (Dougherty 2001, de Figueiredo and Weingast 2005, =-=Bednar 2006-=-, 2009), the union will tend to generate negative externalities. Whether or not the federation surmounts that tendency—whether the states make one another better off rather than worse off—depends upon...

Constitutional Change in Federations: The Role of Complementary Institutions

by Jenna Bednar, Jörg Broschek , 2012
"... This essay applies new developments in complex systems theory to understand how constitutional change can occur informally, without amendment. The chapter develops a three-part theory of constitutional dynamics by analyzing the the complex interaction of the federal system’s varied building blocks: ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
This essay applies new developments in complex systems theory to understand how constitutional change can occur informally, without amendment. The chapter develops a three-part theory of constitutional dynamics by analyzing the the complex interaction of the federal system’s varied building blocks: the national government, the state governments, and the auxiliary institutions of governance (such as a judiciary), and the non-governmental institutions, including the party system. First, constitutional innovation derives from constitutional ambiguity and institutional imperfection. Second, complementary institutions constrain informal constitutional change to an incremental path, preventing radical ruptures from past practice. Third, through a model of behavioral spillovers and cross-domain influences, the chapter offers a theory of the emergence of constitutional trends. These dynamics may help us to to understand how periods of centralization
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...l agents—federal and state governments—have a window to act on their opportunistic urges. Therefore it is natural—unavoidable—to have some variation in the adherence to the distribution of authority (=-=Bednar 2006-=-). National and subnational governments will inevitably press against the boundaries as they pursue policies to serve their own interests, and the safeguards of federalism, themselves imperfect, will ...

Valuing Exit Options

by Jenna Bednar , 2006
"... This paper examines an important aspect of federalism: the effect of a secession threat on the union’s productivity. Productivity requires a compliance maintenance regime with credible punishment. An exit option gives a government the alternative of opting out of the union rather than suffer the dis ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
This paper examines an important aspect of federalism: the effect of a secession threat on the union’s productivity. Productivity requires a compliance maintenance regime with credible punishment. An exit option gives a government the alternative of opting out of the union rather than suffer the disutility of a punishment. Equilibria are characterized over a continuous range of exit option values. The results indicate that only exit options that are superior to union membership improve utility; those of moderate value decrease net and individual government utility due to their harmful effect on compliance maintenance. A prescription that emerges from these results is that if the exit option is inferior to the benefit from a thriving union, member governments should voluntarily submit to measures that make exit as costly as possible. In federalism we observe no perfectly harmonious unions; instead, even the most stable—the United States since 1865, Switzerland—are characterized by near-constant quibbling and, periodically, more serious disputes. Others, such as Canada, seem to be perennially at the brink of rupture. An emerging body of work studies the institutional design supporting
(Show Context)

Citation Context

... in Gilligan & Krehbiel (1987, 1989) the policy realization or outcome is a signal of the intent of the committee that authorized the policy, and would be indexed to indicate the policy source. 3 See =-=Bednar 2006-=- for a full treatment of both cases and general proofs of the claims that follow. i=1 6θ( ∑ xj) + ɛ, where θ is an increasing function. Given this formulation, the noise term could increase or decrea...

1Authority Migration in Federations: A Framework for Analysis

by Jenna Bednar
"... Why does one federation succeed while another fails? Federations may fail for exogenous reasons: foreign invasion, collapse of its currency, or global market forces. If we focus on endogenous factors, the possible reasons for failure include diversity, where populations drift apart or clash too oft ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Why does one federation succeed while another fails? Federations may fail for exogenous reasons: foreign invasion, collapse of its currency, or global market forces. If we focus on endogenous factors, the possible reasons for failure include diversity, where populations drift apart or clash too often, or jealousy from redistributive asymmetry, with unequal shouldering of costs or dispersion of benefits, and, of course, corruption and insurrection. While potentially significant, these problems are not particular to federalism; they threaten all democracies. There is, however, one threat that afflicts federations in particular. It is the one that perplexed and animated James Madison in the American context: opportunistic authority migration between levels of government. Authority may be manipulated by two kinds of actors: the public and the governments themselves. Authority migration can be beneficial: the distribution of authority may be adjusted to make governments more efficient. When initiated by public demand, authority migration demonstrates governmental responsiveness. But it can also be harmful. It can occur not by benevolent design or by majority demand, but instead to 2serve particular interests, often at the cost of the general welfare. In these cases, authority
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...y be tempted to free ride off the efforts of others.sIn other work, I have shown that under a wide range of circumstances, partial compliance is the best that can be hoped; opportunism is inevitable (=-=Bednar 2004-=-). 9Even when the opportunistic authority migration is (incidentally) utility-enhancing, it may destablize the union, not because of the outcome, but because of the process.sWith opportunistic authori...

How Does Reciprocity Work? Evidence from the Laws of War

by James D. Morrow
"... Please do not cite or quote without the author's permission. Abstract-1-Reciprocity is a central concept in much of international relations, particularly international law. The idea that states should respond to one another in kind is deeply ingrained in how we think about international politic ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Please do not cite or quote without the author's permission. Abstract-1-Reciprocity is a central concept in much of international relations, particularly international law. The idea that states should respond to one another in kind is deeply ingrained in how we think about international politics, on topics from the use of force to trade liberalization. Empirical work has shown broad patterns of reciprocity in state interactions (e.g. (Goldstein and Freeman 1990)). Agreements to cooperate are generally believed to be enforced by threats of reciprocal retaliation against defections from the agreement. International institutions, including international law, are believed to aid in reciprocal enforcement in a variety of ways. Despite this general belief about the logic and role of reciprocity in international politics, there are important gaps in our understanding of it. First, the varieties of reciprocity are not always appreciated. The game of iterated Prisoners ' Dilemma game is often used to illustrate the logic of reciprocity; responses are direct, immediate, and proportionate to the defection from the agreement to cooperate. This form of reciprocity can support full cooperation between the
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...er than the offense that triggered it.sReciprocity begins to resemble Keohane's (Keohane 1986) diffuse reciprocity. Noise reduces the level of cooperation that can be maintained through reciprocity ((=-=Bednar 2005-=-), (Kreps 1990), 526-31).sBecause noise raises the possibility of inadvertent retaliation, agreements to cooperate will break down at some times.sFurther, the “wiggle room” between full cooperation an...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University