• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 33,361
Next 10 →

Analysis of Normal Logic Programs

by François Fages, Roberta Gori
"... In this paper we present a dataflow analysis method for normal logic programs interpreted with negation as failure or constructive negation. We apply our method to a well known analysis for logic programs: the depth(k) analysis for approximating the set of computed answers. The analysis is correct w ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
In this paper we present a dataflow analysis method for normal logic programs interpreted with negation as failure or constructive negation. We apply our method to a well known analysis for logic programs: the depth(k) analysis for approximating the set of computed answers. The analysis is correct

Rational Models of Normal Logic Programs

by Sven-erik Bornscheuer, Ki Informatik Tu Dresden - KI-96: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, References 17 volume 1137 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , 1996
"... In general, the application of the meaning function TP to a normal logic program P results in infinite expressions and, hence, is infeasible in practice. On the other hand, the iteration of TP is of interest for several fields in AI. Therefore, we introduce a new representation of interpretations a ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
In general, the application of the meaning function TP to a normal logic program P results in infinite expressions and, hence, is infeasible in practice. On the other hand, the iteration of TP is of interest for several fields in AI. Therefore, we introduce a new representation of interpretations

Modular Equivalence for Normal Logic Programs

by unknown authors
"... Abstract. A Gaifman-Shapiro-style architecture of program modules is introduced in the case of normal logic programs under stable model semantics. The composition of program modules is suitably limited by module conditions which ensure the compatibility of the module system with stable models. The r ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. A Gaifman-Shapiro-style architecture of program modules is introduced in the case of normal logic programs under stable model semantics. The composition of program modules is suitably limited by module conditions which ensure the compatibility of the module system with stable models

Modular Equivalence for Normal Logic Programs ∗

by unknown authors
"... A Gaifman-Shapiro-style architecture of program modules is introduced in the case of normal logic programs under stable model semantics. The composition of program modules is suitably limited by module conditions which ensure the compatibility of the module system with stable models. The resulting m ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
A Gaifman-Shapiro-style architecture of program modules is introduced in the case of normal logic programs under stable model semantics. The composition of program modules is suitably limited by module conditions which ensure the compatibility of the module system with stable models. The resulting

Reduction of Abductive Logic Programs to Normal Logic Programs

by Francesca Toni, Robert A. Kowalski - Proc. 12th ICLP , 1994
"... In this paper we study a form of abductive logic programming which combines default and non-default abducibles and employs retractibles in integrity constraints. We also present a transformation from abductive to normal logic programs, which is correct and complete with respect to many semantics. Th ..."
Abstract - Cited by 15 (6 self) - Add to MetaCart
In this paper we study a form of abductive logic programming which combines default and non-default abducibles and employs retractibles in integrity constraints. We also present a transformation from abductive to normal logic programs, which is correct and complete with respect to many semantics

On the Equivalence of Semantics for Normal Logic Programs

by Jia-huai You, Li Yan Yuan , 1995
"... this paper shows that a number of independently proposed extensions to the stable model semantics coincide: the regular model semantics proposed by You and Yuan, the partial stable model semantics by Sacc`a and Zaniolo, the preferential semantics by Dung, and a stronger version of the stable class s ..."
Abstract - Cited by 43 (18 self) - Add to MetaCart
semantics by Baral and Subrahmanian. We show that these equivalent semantics can be characterized simply as selecting a particular kind of stable classes, called normal alternating fixpoints. In addition, we indicate that almost all proposed semantic frameworks coincide with that of normal alternating

Smodels - an Implementation of the Stable Model and Well-Founded Semantics for Normal Logic Programs

by Ilkka Niemelä, Patrik Simons , 1997
"... The Smodels system is a C++ implementation of the wellfounded and stable model semantics for range-restricted function-free normal programs. The system includes two modules: (i) smodels which implements the two semantics for ground programs and (ii) parse which computes a grounded version of a range ..."
Abstract - Cited by 294 (9 self) - Add to MetaCart
The Smodels system is a C++ implementation of the wellfounded and stable model semantics for range-restricted function-free normal programs. The system includes two modules: (i) smodels which implements the two semantics for ground programs and (ii) parse which computes a grounded version of a

Translation of Aggregate Programs to Normal Logic Programs

by Nikolay Pelov, Marc Denecker, Maurice Bruynooghe - In ASP’03 , 2003
"... We define a translation of aggregate programs to normal logic programs which preserves the set of partial stable models. We then define the classes of definite and stratified aggregate programs and show that the translation of such programs are, respectively, definite and stratified logic progra ..."
Abstract - Cited by 15 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
We define a translation of aggregate programs to normal logic programs which preserves the set of partial stable models. We then define the classes of definite and stratified aggregate programs and show that the translation of such programs are, respectively, definite and stratified logic

On odd and even cycles in normal logic programs

by Fangzhen Lin - In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI–2004), AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA , 2004
"... An odd cycle of a logic program is a simple cycle that has an odd number of negative edges in the dependency graph of the program. Similarly, an even cycle is one that has an even number of negative edges. For a normal logic program that has no odd cycles, while it is known that such a program alway ..."
Abstract - Cited by 7 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
An odd cycle of a logic program is a simple cycle that has an odd number of negative edges in the dependency graph of the program. Similarly, an even cycle is one that has an even number of negative edges. For a normal logic program that has no odd cycles, while it is known that such a program

Efficient Evaluation of Normal Logic Programs

by Terrance Swift , 1994
"... An accident of implementation may be responsible for the fact that Logic Programming, Deductive Databases and Non-Monotonic Reasoning are different subfields. Logic Programming views logic as a programming language --- usually through Prolog or an extension of Prolog. The Deductive Database communi ..."
Abstract - Cited by 9 (4 self) - Add to MetaCart
An accident of implementation may be responsible for the fact that Logic Programming, Deductive Databases and Non-Monotonic Reasoning are different subfields. Logic Programming views logic as a programming language --- usually through Prolog or an extension of Prolog. The Deductive Database
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 33,361
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University