"... In PAGE 10: ... The three protocols that are considered here are Request/Respond, Pub- lish/Subscribe and Broadcast. Table1 shows a comparison of the use of dif- ferent protocols or frequencies of data delivery with respect to the modes of data delivery. As we mentioned in Section 3.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... This was tried on most of the past TRECs apos; ad hoc data, and often made little di#0Berence. However, it was rarely detrimental, and appears bene#0Ccial in TREC#7B8 #28see Table2 #29. 4 Term selection for query expansion Readers who took part in early TRECs will recall discussions on the issue of #5Cselective versus massive quot; query expansion.... In PAGE 5: ... The thresholds varied between ,4 and 4:6; there were other minor variations between runs, including for example the exact treatment of query terms. Table 1: Automatic ad hoc and web track, o#0Ecial runs AveP Run source R score #15 med P10 P30 RPrec Rcl ok8alx TND 20 324 46 570 443 354 694 ok8amxc TD 14 317 45 550 425 347 679 ok8wmx web, as ok8amxc 383 47 516 399 518 900 ok8asxc T 10 279 32 488 380 309 637 Table2 summarizes some diagnostic ad hoc runs, this time with single thresholds. It is not clear that the new term selection procedure o#0Bers any advantage over the old one; more investigation is needed.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ...oss factor is 2:5. The coverage range is 200m. The average SNR on the boundary for the single antenna case is 0 dB, and multi-rate transmission is used. The common parameters used in both cases are summarized in Table2 (see also, [1]). Using the practical parameters from D-Link, the information-bearing data rate and the SNR (after the processing of spatial diversity) satisfy the relationship as in Table 3.... In PAGE 7: ... We also study the impact of SD-MAC, rate adaptation strategies, and contention on the hop distance. The parameters used in the following examples are the same as in Table2 . We assume that the total transmission power of each node is 20dBm and the path loss factor is 2.... ..."

"... In PAGE 25: ... Table8 considers three sets of ad hoc indicators of labor redundancy at the enterprise level, in addition to the figures reported by current directors and to the estimates generated by this paper. One set of ad hoc indicators is based on profitability, as measured by the ratio of gross profits to the value of production, the capital stock, value added, or the number of workers.... In PAGE 25: ...orkers. These indicators should be positively correlated with labor redundancy. However, all these ad hoc indicators are weakly correlated, if at all, with the extent of labor redundancy estimated in this paper. The only strong correlations in Table8 are between the labor redundancy indicators constructed based on the regressions in columns B to E of Table 6. All other coefficients are close to zero.... In PAGE 26: ... Admitting the extent of labor redundancy revealed by the second mode (at around 75 percent) would probably amount to pleading guilty of mismanagement. The correlation coefficients in Table8 show that current directors report lower labor redundancy in enterprises where salaries are high and a large proportion of workers are on permanent or long-term contracts. Laying off workers who earn a substantial rent or enjoy a considerable degree of job security is undoubtedly difficult.... ..."

"... In PAGE 31: ... Table3 gives comparison of typical multicast routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. Metrics used for comparison are the multicast delivery structure, how to acquire and maintain routing information, whether they are loop-free, the dependency on underlying unicast routing protocol, is the control packet flooding being used, the requirement for periodic control messages, the routing hierarchy and their scalability.... ..."

"... In PAGE 7: ... We are still in the process of restoring the data and consequently, we were not able to conduct the second phase of our experiment to test the effectiveness of relevance feedback using a subcollection. According to TREC evaluation measures, which indicate the retrieval performance of the top 1000 documents only, the pseudo- relevance feedback with the adaptive linear model did slightly better than the initial retrieval without feedback, though both runs performed slightly below the median level of all the ad-hoc participants ( Table1 ). As for the subcollection creation results, the smaller and homogeneous FT collection results still held true for the larger and heterogeneous ad-hoc collection.... ..."

"... In PAGE 7: ... We are still in the process of restoring the data and consequently, we were not able to conduct the second phase of our experiment to test the effectiveness of relevance feedback using a subcollection. According to TREC evaluation measures, which indicate the retrieval performance of the top 1000 documents only, the pseudo- relevance feedback with the adaptive linear model did slightly better than the initial retrieval without feedback, though both runs performed slightly below the median level of all the ad-hoc participants ( Table1 ). As for the subcollection creation results, the smaller and homogeneous FT collection results still held true for the larger and heterogeneous ad-hoc collection.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... 2.2 Chinese Ad-Hoc Results Official results for our Chinese retrieval are tabulated in Table1 , with three data columns for the very short (title), short (description) and long queries (all sections). Percentage changes are measured from values in the title... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... Much of this data represented new additions to the CLEF multilingual comparable text corpora: Czech is a totally new language in the ad hoc track although it was introduced into the speech retrieval track last year; the Bulgarian collection was expanded with the addition of another national newspaper, and in order to have com- parable data for English, we acquired a new American-English collection: Los Angeles Times 2002. Table1 summarizes the collections used for each language. The robust task used test collections containing news documents for the period 1994-1995 in three languages (English, French, and Portuguese) used in CLEF 2000 through CLEF 2006.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ...language, type (automatic or manual), use of feedback (typically relevance feedback is used for automatic query expansion), modality (text only, image only or combined) and the initial query (visual only, title only, narrative only or a combination). A summary of submissions by these dimensions is shown in Table1 . No manual runs have been submitted this year, and a large pro- portion are text only using just the title.... In PAGE 17: ...he error rates ranges between 12.6 % and 73.3 % (Table 9). Based on the training data, a system guessing the most frequent group for all 1,000 test images would result with 70.3 % error rate, since 297 radiographs of the test set were from class 12 ( Table1 0). A more realistic baseline of 36.... ..."