• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 2,935
Next 10 →

Model Checking Programs

by Willem Visser, Klaus Havelund, GUILLAUME BRAT, SEUNGJOON PARK, FLAVIO LERDA , 2003
"... The majority of work carried out in the formal methods community throughout the last three decades has (for good reasons) been devoted to special languages designed to make it easier to experiment with mechanized formal methods such as theorem provers, proof checkers and model checkers. In this pape ..."
Abstract - Cited by 592 (63 self) - Add to MetaCart
environment for Java, called Java PathFinder (JPF), which integrates model checking, program analysis and testing. Part of this work has consisted of building a new Java Virtual Machine that interprets Java bytecode. JPF uses state compression to handle big states, and partial order and symmetry reduction

Model checking and abstraction

by Peter J. Clarke, Djuradj Babich, Tariq M. King, B. M. Golam Kibria - ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems , 1994
"... software developers are using the Java language as the language of choice on many applications. This is due to the effective use of the object-oriented (OO) paradigm to develop large software projects and the ability of the Java language to support the increasing use of web technologies in business ..."
Abstract - Cited by 742 (55 self) - Add to MetaCart
applications. This knowledge would be of significant benefit to aid developers in testing and maintenance activities during the software process. 1

Bandera: Extracting Finite-state Models from Java Source Code

by James C. Corbett, Matthew B. Dwyer, John Hatcliff, Shawn Laubach, Corina S. Pasareanu, Hongjun Zheng - IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING , 2000
"... Finite-state verification techniques, such as model checking, have shown promise as a cost-effective means for finding defects in hardware designs. To date, the application of these techniques to software has been hindered by several obstacles. Chief among these is the problem of constructing a fini ..."
Abstract - Cited by 654 (33 self) - Add to MetaCart
Finite-state verification techniques, such as model checking, have shown promise as a cost-effective means for finding defects in hardware designs. To date, the application of these techniques to software has been hindered by several obstacles. Chief among these is the problem of constructing a

Formal Methods: State of the Art and Future Directions

by Edmund M. Clarke, Jeannette M. Wing - ACM Computing Surveys , 1996
"... ing with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, to redistribute to lists, or to use any component of this work in other works, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Permissions may be requested from Publications Dept, ACM Inc., 1515 Broadway, New York, N ..."
Abstract - Cited by 425 (6 self) - Add to MetaCart
, formal methods, hardware verification Additional Key Words and Phrases: Software specification, model checking, theorem proving 1. INTRODUCTION Hardware and software systems will inevitably grow in scale and functionality. Because of this increase in complexity, the likelihood of subtle errors is much

Automatically validating temporal safety properties of interfaces

by Thomas Ball, Sriram K. Rajamani , 2001
"... We present a process for validating temporal safety properties of software that uses a well-defined interface. The process requires only that the user state the property of interest. It then automatically creates abstractions of C code using iterative refinement, based on the given property. The pro ..."
Abstract - Cited by 433 (21 self) - Add to MetaCart
that the process converges on a set of predicates powerful enough to validate properties in just a few iterations. 1 Introduction Large-scale software has many components built by many programmers. Integration testing of these components is impossible or ineffective at best. Property checking of interface usage

Modular verification of software components in C

by Sagar Chaki, Edmund Clarke, Alex Groce, et al. - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING , 2003
"... We present a new methodology for automatic verification of C programs against finite state machine specifications. Our approach is compositional, naturally enabling us to decompose the verification of large software systems into subproblems of manageable complexity. The decomposition reflects the mo ..."
Abstract - Cited by 233 (23 self) - Add to MetaCart
We present a new methodology for automatic verification of C programs against finite state machine specifications. Our approach is compositional, naturally enabling us to decompose the verification of large software systems into subproblems of manageable complexity. The decomposition reflects

Generalized Symbolic Execution for Model Checking and Testing

by Sarfraz Khurshid, Corina S. Pasareanu, Willem Visser , 2003
"... Modern software systems, which often are concurrent and manipulate complex data structures must be extremely reliable. We present a novel framework based on symbolic execution, for automated checking of such systems. We provide a two-fold generalization of traditional symbolic execution based ap ..."
Abstract - Cited by 232 (52 self) - Add to MetaCart
Modern software systems, which often are concurrent and manipulate complex data structures must be extremely reliable. We present a novel framework based on symbolic execution, for automated checking of such systems. We provide a two-fold generalization of traditional symbolic execution based

Software Verification with BLAST

by Thomas A. Henzinger, Ranjit Jhala, Rupak Majumdar, Gregoire Sutre , 2003
"... Introduction. Blast (the Berkeley Lazy Abstraction Software verification Tool) is a verification system for checking safety properties of C programs using automatic property-driven construction and model checking of software abstractions. Blast implements an abstract-model check-refine loop to chec ..."
Abstract - Cited by 168 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
Introduction. Blast (the Berkeley Lazy Abstraction Software verification Tool) is a verification system for checking safety properties of C programs using automatic property-driven construction and model checking of software abstractions. Blast implements an abstract-model check-refine loop

Bounded model checking

by Armin Biere , 2009
"... Besides Equivalence Checking [KK97, KPKG02] the most important industrial application of SAT is currently Bounded Model Checking (BMC) [BCCZ99]. Both techniques are used for formal hardware verification in the context of electronic design automation (EDA), but have successfully been applied to many ..."
Abstract - Cited by 165 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
Besides Equivalence Checking [KK97, KPKG02] the most important industrial application of SAT is currently Bounded Model Checking (BMC) [BCCZ99]. Both techniques are used for formal hardware verification in the context of electronic design automation (EDA), but have successfully been applied to many

MOPS: an Infrastructure for Examining Security Properties of Software

by Hao Chen, David Wagner - In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security , 2002
"... We describe a formal approach for finding bugs in security-relevant software and verifying their absence. The idea is as follows: we identify rules of safe programming practice, encode them as safety properties, and verify whether these properties are obeyed. Because manual verification is too expen ..."
Abstract - Cited by 233 (8 self) - Add to MetaCart
We describe a formal approach for finding bugs in security-relevant software and verifying their absence. The idea is as follows: we identify rules of safe programming practice, encode them as safety properties, and verify whether these properties are obeyed. Because manual verification is too
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 2,935
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University