Tools
Sorted by:
Try your query at:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Results 11 - 20
of
3,297
Table 3. Archiver Differences
"... In PAGE 2: ...Table3... In PAGE 3: ...EPICS Modes 6 2 Circular logging Yes No Runs on All Ports UNIX command networking client/server OS + TCP/IP Multiple loggers/node Internal through server OS Add channels dynamically Yes Yes Delete channels dynamically Yes No Max rate limited by computer clock, gt;500Hz 20Hz Text message stamp Yes No SQL searches of log file Yes No SQL interface integrated with all tools Yes No ASCII Export Yes Yes Interrogate logger status? Yes No Catalog Manager Yes No Log file concatenate / merge? Yes No Playback Yes No API to run logger Yes No Log file access API Read/write No Max rate benchmark 1,000,000 reals/sec. Compression Yes No Graphical Viewer Yes Yes Table3 shows that the Vsystem Logger is a much more comprehensive tool than the EPICS Frequency based Archiver and indeed Vlogger is an industry leader product in performance and capabilities. We know of no commercial product with capabilities even close to Vlogger.... ..."
Table 1: Archive Databases
2000
Cited by 5
Table 4 Most frequently copied data at CDS for the period May1994/May1995. 6 Interconnectivity with Other Services A WWW access to the A amp;A Tables and Abstracts has been installed since November 1993 from the URL http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/CDS.html. It allows a direct connection between the Tables and Abstracts: for instance one or several abstracts can be retrieved from a set of words { authors apos; names or words existing in the abstract { and a hyperlink provides an immediate access to the corresponding electronic tables when such tables exist. The WWW allows many more connections to Databases, Abstract Services, observation archives, etc. See e.g. Egret [?] in this conference. The present usage (May 1995) is 1500 full abstracts retrieved monthly in 1000 connections. 7
1150
"... In PAGE 6: ... The CDS FTP server also allows the compression or decompression of the data les during the transfer; for more details see Ochsenbein [?]. Another measure which comes out of the usage of data copied from CDS is the popularity of electronic tables: the most frequently copied catalogues from the CDS archives by external users during the last year are listed in Table4 : one can notice the popularity of \classics quot; like the Bright Star or the Nearby Star catalogues, or of the NGC catalogue. The gures concerning only the tables resulting from the agreement between CDS and A amp;A are given in Table 5, where the popularity of the stellar models can be noticed.... ..."
Table 1: Archive Design Space
1999
"... In PAGE 5: ... When archives become quot;smart quot; again, it will be in other functionalities, not in duplication of bucket functionality. Using this terminology, Table1 illustrates... ..."
Cited by 7
Table 1: Archive Design Space
1999
"... In PAGE 5: ... When archives become quot;smart quot; again, it will be in other functionalities, not in duplication of bucket functionality. Using this terminology, Table1 illustrates... ..."
Cited by 7
Table 1. Archive Design Space
1999
"... In PAGE 2: ... Users will find buckets through a DL interface, and once found they will interact with the buckets themselves. Other DL models are possible ( Table1 ). The Smart Objects, Smart Archives (SOSA) model is possible, even likely to be the quot;default quot; DL of the future.... ..."
Cited by 4
Table 10. Examples of subject archives
"... In PAGE 67: ...cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk), E-BioSci (www.e-biosci.org), RePEC (repec.org), etc. ( Table10 ). In July 2004, there were 208 open access archives listed by eprints.... ..."
Table 3. Materials in The Drucker Archives
TABLE. Datasets archived in local storage
Results 11 - 20
of
3,297
