Results 1 - 10
of
723
Table 4: Ft. Benning Evaluation
"... In PAGE 7: ...shown in Table4 . The reference model is not shown.... ..."
Table 1. Flooding efficiencies.
2006
"... In PAGE 8: ...terminating. Table1 shows the ratio of the average number of messages per flood for the Partitions design over the average number of messages per flood in Gnutella. Replication means that each Leaf sends all its keywords to all Ultrapeers it is connected to, regardless of category.... ..."
Cited by 1
Table 2: Ft. Benning Automatic Result
"... In PAGE 6: ... However, parts of the gabled buildings in the upper center have not been detect- ed. Table2 gives a comparison of the number of fea- tures and final result component counts with and without use of IFSAR cues for the Fort Benning ex- ample. 4 System Evaluation We define detection rate and false alarm rates as fol- lows for quantitative evaluation of our results.... ..."
Table 3: Flooding Measurements
1994
Cited by 2
Table 9. Required Reductions in Peak Flood Stage and Flood Damage for Alternative
"... In PAGE 36: ...3% to 10.2% in the WRW before breaking even ( Table9 ). These estimates of required reductions in peak flood stage and flood damage required for economic feasibility may be useful to future and/or alternative hydrologic modeling studies of the effects of wetland storage on flooding.... ..."
Table 2: Flood test summary.
"... In PAGE 17: ... Finally, testing revealed that the system does not block against all of the threats it claims. Specifically, a UDP flood at port 5060 was not blocked by the system (see Table2 below). Table 2: Flood test summary.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
723