"... In PAGE 11: ... For each of the services used by a substantial number of sample members we employed logistic regression methods to test for associations between service use, degree of intellectual disability and challenging behaviour, controlling for age, the (average) number of residents in the accommodation facility and whether the provider was an NHS Trust or an independent sector provider. Table5 shows, for each service, whether these factors increased or decreased the probability of using it. [TABLE 5 ABOUT HERE] ... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... The remainder of the article describes the intellectual diversity in the section during the 1990s. The full scope of diverse audiences is best seen in a summary table (see Table1 ). This indicates some of the complex interests that the section balanced.... In PAGE 3: ... The comments column briefly indicates the importance of each dimension in shaping the decisions of the section. Readers should recognize that Table1 presents each dimension as a discrete entity for ana- lytic purposes only. Individual section members often occupy more than one location on the same dimension; for example, a sociologist may value computing in both teaching and research or may use computers for analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data.... In PAGE 4: ...Table1 deserve only brief mention because they are beyond the scope of this article. One group that joined the section in its early years was novice users who hoped to learn more about computers.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ...able 1: States as actors and structures............................................................................... 8 Table2 : Mechanisms of intellectual property protection .... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... Onge, 1996; Stewart, 1997; Sveiby, 1997; Kaplan and Norton, 1997). This is indicated in Table1 which provides an outline of three of the more developed intellectual capital models. Table 1: Emerging Intellectual Capital Templates... ..."

"... In PAGE 15: ... Organisations were then asked about the level of importance they attached to certain elements of intellectual capital, ranging from of vital importance to not important at all. The responses can be seen in Table2 . Most elements were seen to be at least important by over 85% of the responding organisations, with, perhaps unsurprisingly, the elements deemed to be of vital importance to most organisations being their reputation and customer satisfaction.... In PAGE 18: ...18 least very important (see Table2 ). A sector analysis did not reveal any trends apart from the fact that all organisations associated with health measured complaints.... In PAGE 20: ... Yahya and Goh (2002:466) state that companies should encourage risk taking when it comes to problem solving, thus an atmosphere where there is no fear of failure needs to be created and whilst there was some evidence of a supportive culture overall the survey produced a rather mixed set of responses. Only 11 (19 per cent) organisations maintained an ideas database, yet 48 (84 per cent) stated that employee innovation was at least very important (see Table2 ). Other relevant findings (see Tables 3 and 5) were new ideas generated by members of staff, measured by 26 (46 per cent) organisations, ratio of new ideas generated to new ideas implemented, measured by seven (12 per cent), the value of new ideas, measured by 25 (44 per cent) and expenditure on rewards for innovation, which was measured by ... In PAGE 23: ... Not everything that was deemed to be important was being measured and in areas such as innovation the approach, though commendable in many cases, appeared to be a little chaotic. If the responses in Table2 are followed through to their related measurements there was often a mismatch, for example reputation of organisation that was deemed to be at least important by all respondents, yet was only being measured by just over half. Moreover, despite the large number of respondents measuring both staff and customer satisfaction (81 per cent and 89.... ..."