Results 1 - 10
of
2,797
Table 1. Lineup Performance: Sequential Versus Simultaneous Lineup Formats Sequential Simultaneous
2001
"... In PAGE 6: ... Participants who make a choice from the lineup ( choosers ) may select the per- petrator (if present) or may choose a foil. First, considering a target-present lineup, we find that 74% of participants viewing a simultaneous lineup are choosers, that is, they actually make a choice from the lineup, whereas 54% of sequential lineup participants are choosers (see Table1 ). This 20% represents a significant difference, Z D 5.... ..."
Cited by 4
Table 2. Stem-and-Leaf Display of Effect Sizes (r). Target Present Lineups: Correct Identifications
2001
Cited by 4
Table 6. Graphical Classifications
"... In PAGE 4: ... A Textual layer deals with all information as the form of alphanumerical characters in the image, that have weak spatial relationship (near); a background layer contains the rest (schematics, realistics) and none when the attribute has no graphical interest. Table6 shows the graphical classifications for the... ..."
Table 1: Graphical Representation
"... In PAGE 2: ... Figures 3, 5, and 6 show some GRAPES-DD#2FER examples. Table1 lists the basic graphical representa- tions of EXPRESS-G and GRAPES-DD#2FER. In con- trast to GRAPES-DD#2FER, EXPRESS-G includes the concept of inheritance by the speci#0Ccation of super-... ..."
Table 3. The graphical context.
"... In PAGE 9: ... It can also be no- ticed that several demonstrations can occur within a single utterance. To capture this information we include in the annotation scheme a representation of the context as shown in Table3 , where the information that can be accessed by vis- ual perception and sets the context for the dialogue is specified. Spatial demon- strative expressions refer always to these objects.... In PAGE 10: ...Tables 2 shows a fragment of an annotated dialogue of a Rearrange contribu- tion type and Table3 shows the corresponding context. During the presentation phase (utt11-14) a graphical action and its corresponding referents are explicitly identified.... ..."
Table 3. The graphical context.
"... In PAGE 9: ... It can also be no- ticed that several demonstrations can occur within a single utterance. To capture this information we include in the annotation scheme a representation of the context as shown in Table3 , where the information that can be accessed by vis- ual perception and sets the context for the dialogue is specified. Spatial demon- strative expressions refer always to these objects.... In PAGE 10: ...Tables 2 shows a fragment of an annotated dialogue of a Rearrange contribu- tion type and Table3 shows the corresponding context. During the presentation phase (utt11-14) a graphical action and its corresponding referents are explicitly identified.... ..."
Table 1: Graphical Notations
2002
"... In PAGE 2: ...Fig. 2: Standard SISO Algorithm (see Table1 for notations; adopted from [8]) The memory consumption and latency are significantly reduced when sliding window approach is used [3] [7]. The backward (and/or forward) metrics are initialized at an intermediate point instead of at the end (or at the beginning, for forward metrics) of the block.... ..."
Cited by 1
Results 1 - 10
of
2,797