"... In PAGE 8: ...aster Builders Granular Iron. ......................................................................................31 Table13 . Hydraulic Conductivity Values Used in Ground-water Flow Simulations to Compare Relative Capture Areas and Residence Times of Two Barrier Designs.... In PAGE 27: ... Reactive Barrier Designs Five three-dimensional numerical flow simulations were performed to assess the relative efficiency of a Funnel-and-Gate versus a continuous wall configuration (Bennett, 1997). In these simulations, the entire model domain was assigned a uniform hydraulic conductivity ( Table13 ). A range in aquifer hydraulic conductivity values was simulated in order to bracket the anticipated range of ground-water velocities, capture areas and residence times.... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ...ritten to or read from, never both. This is the memory model adopted by the WPRAM. 3.3 Case Example Table2 shows how the WPRAM algorithm designer must organise the WPRAM code so that cache consistency is guaranteed at the points of barrier synchronisation. The operations in bold are the WPRAM programming interface primitives and the operations in italics explain how the lower level DMM model implements the memory accesses under the caching mechanism.... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ... Table2 . Weobtainanaverage 5-26% improvement, which demonstrates the importance of the barrier free design.... ..."

"... In PAGE 17: ... 4.2 Disposal Practices Table6 lists the current LLW disposal site designs being used by the programs included in this study. Designs include near-surface disposal with engineered structures and/or surface barriers, intermediate-depth geologic disposal, and deep geologic disposal.... ..."

"... In PAGE 12: ...Table 1: Network design problems In Table1 , \n quot;, \m quot; and \nonz quot; are, respectively, the number of columns, constraints and nonzeroes after the linear program has been preprocessed by CPLEX. \Barrier time quot; is the time that the barrier code required to solve the problem to default tolerances, in seconds, excluding the time required to compute the Cholesky factorization.... In PAGE 13: ... On TRIPARTITE problems the Barrier method appears to be much more e ective than the dual simplex; however, it does require signi cantly more memory. The 1%-approximation Cplex running times using the barrier method follow the same convention as in Table1 ; in the case the dual simplex method we report the run time when the method was used with a 1% optimality tolerance. m n nonz Barrier Barrier -approx GOPS -approx GOPS Problem time 1% time 1% time 1% time 1% iter 1% iter tripart1 3838 25632 75232 29 17 18 338 941 66072 tripart2 18741 127007 368526 237 176 509 6772 2831 180368 tripart3 37541 312034 917288 1126 875 1287 - 3272 - tripart4 54769 783817 2322024 11624 9687 2370 - 5191 - Table 2: TRIPARTITE instances.... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ... Table2 . We obtain an average 5-26% improvement, which demonstrates the importance of the barrier free design.... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ... Table2 . We obtain an average 5-26% improvement, which demonstrates the importance of the barrier free design.... ..."

"... In PAGE 13: ...ncountering the RUM. Total depths ranged between 31.1 m (102 ft) and 32.5 m (106.5 ft) bgs. Table2 -1 summarizes the pertinent drilling information. All drilling activities were documented in accordance with BHI-EE-01, Environmental Investigations Procedures, Procedure 6.... In PAGE 14: ... The well designs meet the minimum standards required by Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-160 and/or applicable variances for construction of resource protection wells. Table2 -2 summarizes the well completion data. A summary of well completion materials is provided in the well construction summary reports (see Appendix B).... In PAGE 15: ... All water produced during pumping development was contained in purgewater trucks. Table2 -3 summarizes the final well development data. The well development and testing data sheets and drawdown/recovery charts are included in Appendix C.... In PAGE 15: ... Pump intakes were set approximately 0.3 m (1 ft) above the bottom of the well screen (see Table2 -2). Three ISRM barrier wells had extraction/injection assemblies installed with the pump intakes set approximately at the mid- point of the screens.... In PAGE 16: ...0 mg/kg) of hexavalent chromium. All drill cuttings from above the water table were below the release criterion for radioactivity and hexavalent chromium and were discharged to the ground ( Table2 -4). Water samples were collected when the water table was first encountered during drilling.... In PAGE 16: ... With the exception of wells 199-D4-31 and 199-D4-36, analyses were below the release criterion for hexavalent chromium for fluids of 110 ppb (0.110 mg/L), and the fluids were discharged to the ground ( Table2 -4). The water from drilling wells 199-D4-31 and 199-D4-36 was contained and transferred to the purgewater truck during final well development.... In PAGE 16: ... With a quality control (QC) designation of QC-1, no laboratory control standards or matrix spike samples were required. The well development test results are summarized in Table2 -3, and the hexavalent chromium field screening results are provided in Table 2-4. 2.... In PAGE 17: ... For this evaluation, well 199-D4-21 was selected. Table2 -5 summarizes the results from the adjacent well study. From a distance of 10.... In PAGE 17: ... Appendix D provides graphs of the data summarized in Table 2-5. Table2 -6 summarizes the impacts of air drilling to an established well. Only one set of readings from well 199-D4-21 (taken on April 12, 2000) potentially indicated that the area around an established well was influenced.... In PAGE 18: ... All values shown in the survey data report are expressed in metric units. The results of the survey are summarized in Table2 -1, and the survey data reports are included in Appendix E.... In PAGE 20: ...Technical Data Rev. 0 ISRM Barrier Well Completion Report for the 100-HR-3 Groundwater OU, FY 00 August 2000 2-8 Table2 -1. Drilling Summary.... In PAGE 21: ...H I - 01381 Tech n i cal Dat a Re v . 0 ISR M B a r r i e r W e l l Com p l e t i on R e por t f o r t h e 100-H R -3 G r oundw at e r O U , F Y 00 A ugus t 2 000 2- 9 Table2 -2. Well Completion Summary.... In PAGE 22: ...H I - 01381 Tech n i cal Dat a Re v . 0 ISR M B a r r i e r W e l l Com p l e t i on R e por t f o r t h e 100-H R -3 G r oundw at e r O U , F Y 00 A ugus t 2 000 2- 10 Table2 -3. Well Development Data.... In PAGE 23: ...Technical Data Rev. 0 ISRM Barrier Well Completion Report for the 100-HR-3 Groundwater OU, FY 00 August 2000 2-11 Table2 -4. Hexavalent Chromium Field Screening Results.... In PAGE 24: ...Technical Data Rev. 0 ISRM Barrier Well Completion Report for the 100-HR-3 Groundwater OU, FY 00 August 2000 2-12 Table2 -4. Hexavalent Chromium Field Screening Results.... In PAGE 25: ...M B a r r i e r W e l l Com p l e t i on R e por t f o r t h e 100-H R -3 G r oundw at e r O U , F Y 00 A ugus t 2 000 2- 13 B H I - 01381 Tech n i cal Dat a Re v . 0 Table2 -5. ISRM FY 2000 Air Drilling -- Dissolved Oxygen/Water Level Summary (Adjacent Wells).... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... Thus, we add barrier expressions to the original specification of access expressions given in Table 1. The specification for barrier expressions appears in Table2 . For each source code access expression Table 3 gives the form of the corresponding explicit- barrier IR.... ..."