"... In PAGE 3: ... The probability densities obtained and the data are reported in Table 1. The maximum correlation matrix in Table 2 is obtained from Table1 . The PCA on R+ gives a graphic display (Figure 1) showing that the unknown distribution is closer to the generalized Poisson than the negative binomial and others, and quite far from the classic... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... The moments of the multiplicity distribution for intervals j j lt; cut are given in Table 3. Results of ts with the negative binomial are given in Table4 . A comparison of the average multiplicity for small central intervals given in Tables 1 and 3, shows that the particle density is about 20% lower at = 0 than that at y = 0 and that the C-moments are larger for symmetric pseudo- rapidity intervals than for rapidity intervals with the same numerical cut value.... ..."

"... In PAGE 7: ... The expression for Pn also depends on h~ ni or hni. The latter t parameter is denoted by m in Table5 . Exact scaling implies that d and c are energy independent.... In PAGE 18: ...studied pseudorapidity and W intervals are summarised in Table5 . The errors quoted are the quadratic sum of the statistical error and the systematic uncertainties.... In PAGE 18: ... 4 shows how the LND (NBD) compares to the measurements. Inspection of this gure and of Table5 indicates that the LND gives a reasonably accurate description of the data, in particular in the smallest domain. However, the quality of the ts deteriorates in larger domains.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ... For jyj lt; 0:5, 1=k is about constant for single intervals, while it increases slightly with decreasing azimuthal size for opposite intervals. Results for negative particles are given in Table10 . The 1=k parameter is shown in Fig.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ...(3) Estimates of equation (2) are shown in Table1 for the total sample of 1014 subprograms (column 2), as well as sub-samples consisting of only new subprograms (column 3), extensively modified subprograms (column 4), and slightly modified subprograms (column 5). The numbers in the parentheses are the standard errors associated with the coefficient estimates.... In PAGE 4: ... This maximum can be computed by taking the partial derivative of equation (3) with respect to SLOC. Setting this derivative equal to zero and solving for SLOC, we find the optimum number of SLOC for subprograms to be: SLOCopt = exp((1- a1)/2 a2)(4) The last row of Table1 shows the values of the optimum SLOC for each of the regressions. For the total sample, the value of the optimum SLOC is 78 lines of code.... ..."

"... In PAGE 12: ...eb site http://nero. inforrnatik. uni-wuerzburg. de/MPEG/. Table1 contains the statistics for the number of ATM cells in each frame (frame size) that have been calculated by assuming that every frame is divided into a group of cells each ... In PAGE 15: ... [19] propose the gamma distribution for the frame size. As a discrete version of the gamma distribution, let us assume that the distribu- tion of the frame size is negative binomial whose parameters are determined from the mean and variance of the actual data given in Table1 . Thus the probability generation functions for the frame size are given by with parameters given in Table 2.... ..."

"... In PAGE 25: ... Even after controlling for all other characteristics observable in the census, the general pattern observed in Table 3 remains: first generation immigrants had much higher child mortality than the native-born. Table5 presents the estimated marginal effects of the fertility model first estimated without taking into account the likely endogeneity of child mortality ( No instruments ) and then estimated using the two-stage procedure. The marginal effects represent the derivatives with respect to the regressors of the expected number of children ever-born evaluated at the sample means.... In PAGE 27: ... In other words, the negative binomial in the kernel regime collapses to the Poisson distribution. What is clear from both models presented in Table5 is that there were substantial ethnic differences in fertility behavior. Even after controlling for ages at marriage, marital duration, occupational status, and place of residence, immigrants had larger families than natives.... ..."