"... In PAGE 54: ... While this t echnique can capture the onset of yield, a method to accurately represent the post - yield behavior must be explored. Table4 - 2. Determination of ultimate yield stress using facesheet plasticity in non - delaminated model.... In PAGE 55: ... Table4 - 3. Determination of ultimate yield stress using core plasticity in non - delaminated model.... In PAGE 63: ... Table4 - 4. Finite element results for edgewise compressive study using elastic material model.... In PAGE 64: ... Table4 - 5. Finite element results for the edgewise compressive stud y using an elasto - plastic material model.... ..."

"... In PAGE 36: ... Results The preliminaries Thirty-eight percent of the children were willing to make initial predictionson the steel and aluminum problems. Overwhelmingly, these children predic- ted on the basis of material rather than size (see Table9 ). When confronted with less familiar materials (i.... ..."

"... In PAGE 35: ... The southernmost tank was void of any residue or liquid. Constituents detected above the instrument detection limits from a sample taken from the northernmost tank are listed in Table2 -1. The sample was analyzed for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, TCLP metals, pH, and gamma spectrometry of radionuclides.... In PAGE 40: ....3.3 Radiological Preliminary Action Levels There are two different sets of radiological PALs for this CAIP. The first set of PALs are the removable limits for surface radioactivity listed in Table2 -2 of the RADCON Manual (Gile, 1996). ... In PAGE 45: ... A 95 percent confidence level will be used to evaluate Tier I and Tier II error for random sampling. The number and locations of measurement and sampling points will be based on a comparison with the criteria in Table2 -2 of the RADCON Manual (Gile, 1996) and the DQO objectives for precision and representativeness. Systematic measurements, in conjunction with surface scanning, are used to obtain adequate assurance that small areas of elevated radioactivity will be detected and demonstrate whether or not radiological contamination exceeds the release criteria in Table 2-2 of the RADCON Manual.... In PAGE 45: ... The number and locations of measurement and sampling points will be based on a comparison with the criteria in Table 2-2 of the RADCON Manual (Gile, 1996) and the DQO objectives for precision and representativeness. Systematic measurements, in conjunction with surface scanning, are used to obtain adequate assurance that small areas of elevated radioactivity will be detected and demonstrate whether or not radiological contamination exceeds the release criteria in Table2 -2 of the RADCON Manual. In addition, biased sampling measurement locations and scanning locations may be performed.... In PAGE 49: ... To allow for the segregation of radioactive and nonradioactive waste and materials, radiological swipe surveys may be conducted on reusable sampling equipment, PPE, disposable sampling equipment, and sanitary waste streams exiting from within the controlled area. Removable contamination limits, as defined in Table2 -2 of the RADCON ... ..."

"... In PAGE 17: ... 1.5 EXISTING REFERENCES Table1 -1 presents a list of all of the references that were reviewed as part of this DQO scoping process, as well as a summary of the pertinent information contained within each reference. These references were the primary source for the background information presented in Section 1.... In PAGE 17: ...6. Table1 -1. Existing References.... In PAGE 18: ...Rev. 0 1-5 Table1 -1. Existing References.... In PAGE 19: ... The 105-F FSB, located on the south side of the 105-F Reactor building, served as an underwater collection, storage, and transfer facility for irradiated fuel elements discharged from the reactor. Table1 -2 identifies the different rooms and areas comprising the 105-F FSB complex. Table 1-2.... In PAGE 19: ... Table 1-2 identifies the different rooms and areas comprising the 105-F FSB complex. Table1 -2. Elements of the 105-F FSB Complex.... In PAGE 20: ...Rev. 0 1-7 Table1 -2. Elements of the 105-F FSB Complex.... In PAGE 21: ... Project planning began to remove the fill material and recover any fuel rods in these FSBs. Several plans and reports were prepared (see Table1 -1). Two characterization efforts were made as part of the removal projects.... In PAGE 22: ... These tables also identify the organization that each DQO Team member or key decision maker represents, as well as their technical area of expertise and telephone number. Table1 -3. DQO Team Members.... In PAGE 23: ...Rev. 0 1-10 Table1 -3. DQO Team Members.... In PAGE 23: ... DQO Team Members. (2 pages) Name Organization Role and Responsibility Telephone Number Grant Ceffalo BHI/RadCon Radiological Engineer/Survey Design 373-6238 Dave Blumenkranz CHI/DEG Survey Design 372-9658 Roy Bauer CHI/EEG DQO Development Support 372-9622 Wendy Thompson BHI/SAC Sampling and Field Measurements 372-9487 Pam Doctor BHI/NRR Review of Sampling Design, Statistician 372-9107 Table1 -4. DQO Key Decision Makers.... In PAGE 23: ...able 1-4. DQO Key Decision Makers. Name Organization Role and Responsibility Telephone Number Chris Smith RL/ERD RL oversight of the 105-F Reactor Interim Safe Storage Project 372-1544 Dennis Faulk EPA EPA Project Manager for the 105-F Area 376-8631 1.8 PROJECT BUDGET AND CONTRACTUAL VEHICLES Table1 -5 presents the budget for all of the project activities associated with the development and implementation of the sampling program, the performance of laboratory analyses, the performance of the data quality assessment, and the evaluation and reporting of investigation results. For those activities that need to be subcontracted, Table 1-5 presents the available... In PAGE 23: ...8 PROJECT BUDGET AND CONTRACTUAL VEHICLES Table 1-5 presents the budget for all of the project activities associated with the development and implementation of the sampling program, the performance of laboratory analyses, the performance of the data quality assessment, and the evaluation and reporting of investigation results. For those activities that need to be subcontracted, Table1 -5 presents the available... In PAGE 24: ...Rev. 0 1-11 Table1 -5. Project Budget and Contractual Vehicles.... In PAGE 24: ... DWP = detailed work plan ERC = Environmental Restoration Contractor 1.9 PROJECT MILESTONE DATES Table1 -6 presents the milestone dates for the completion of all of the project activities associated with the development and implementation of the sampling program, the performance of laboratory analyses, the performance of a data quality assessment, and the evaluation and reporting of investigation results. Table 1-6.... In PAGE 24: ...9 PROJECT MILESTONE DATES Table 1-6 presents the milestone dates for the completion of all of the project activities associated with the development and implementation of the sampling program, the performance of laboratory analyses, the performance of a data quality assessment, and the evaluation and reporting of investigation results. Table1 -6. Project Milestone Dates.... In PAGE 25: ...10.1 Total List of Contaminants of Potential Concern Table1 -7 identifies all of the COPCs for each of the waste streams expected to be generated within each functional area of the facility. The waste streams are numbered for tracking purposes.... In PAGE 25: ... These waste stream numbers do not represent waste code numbers. Table1 -7. Total List of COPCs for Each Waste Stream.... In PAGE 25: ...ssociated COPCs are addressed by concurrent activities (i.e., under a separate SAP or waste management plan), these waste streams/associated COPCs may be excluded from further consideration from this DQO. Table1 -8 presents a list of the COPCs that are being removed from the total list of COPCs for this reason. Table 1-8.... In PAGE 25: ... Table 1-8 presents a list of the COPCs that are being removed from the total list of COPCs for this reason. Table1 -8. COPCs Addressed by Concurrent D amp;D Activities.... In PAGE 25: ...10.3 Other Contaminant of Potential Concern Exclusions Table1 -9 presents a list of all other COPCs to be excluded from the investigation. These exclusions are in addition to the exclusions identified in Table 1-8 and are based on physical laws, process knowledge, project focus, or other mitigating factors.... In PAGE 25: ....10.3 Other Contaminant of Potential Concern Exclusions Table 1-9 presents a list of all other COPCs to be excluded from the investigation. These exclusions are in addition to the exclusions identified in Table1 -8 and are based on physical laws, process knowledge, project focus, or other mitigating factors. Table 1-9 provides the... In PAGE 25: ... These exclusions are in addition to the exclusions identified in Table 1-8 and are based on physical laws, process knowledge, project focus, or other mitigating factors. Table1 -9 provides the... In PAGE 26: ...Rev. 0 1-13 Table1 -9. Rationale for COPC Exclusions.... In PAGE 26: ... It was not found in the 105-DR FSB above the minimum detectable activity. Consistent with the discussion in the 105-F and 105-DR Phase III DQO ( Table1 -7 in BHI 1999), it will be eliminated as a COC at other reactors, as it was not found in sufficient quantity to be a concern for the interim closure of the reactor structures. K-40 This is a naturally occurring isotope.... In PAGE 27: ...10.4 Final List of Contaminants of Concern Table1 -10 presents the final list of COCs for each waste stream number to be carried through the remainder of the DQO process. Table 1-10.... In PAGE 27: ....10.4 Final List of Contaminants of Concern Table 1-10 presents the final list of COCs for each waste stream number to be carried through the remainder of the DQO process. Table1 -10. Final List of COCs.... In PAGE 27: ...10.5 Distribution of Contaminants of Concern Table1 -11 identifies the best understanding of how each of the COCs arrived at the facility and the fate and transport mechanisms (e.g.... In PAGE 27: ...istribution (e.g., layering or lateral homogeneity) of each of the COCs. Table1 -11. Distribution of COCs.... In PAGE 28: ... 0 1-15 1.11 CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE The current and potential future uses for the land in the immediate vicinity of the facility under investigation are summarized in Table1 -12. This information is needed later in the DQO process to support the evaluation of decision error consequences.... In PAGE 28: ... This information is needed later in the DQO process to support the evaluation of decision error consequences. Table1 -12. Current and Potential Future Land Use.... In PAGE 28: ... 1.12 PRELIMINARY ACTION LEVELS The preliminary action levels that apply to each of the COCs are presented in Table1 -13 with the basis for each level. The action level is defined as the threshold value that provides the criterion for choosing between alternative actions.... In PAGE 29: ... The conceptual site model is continuously being refined as more data become available. Table1 -14 presents a tabular depiction of the conceptual site model, identifying the sources, release mechanisms, migration pathways, and potential receptors for each of the COCs. Table 1-14.... In PAGE 29: ... Table 1-14 presents a tabular depiction of the conceptual site model, identifying the sources, release mechanisms, migration pathways, and potential receptors for each of the COCs. Table1 -14. Tabular Depiction of the Conceptual Site Model.... ..."

"... In PAGE 33: ...3 NBAC estimates that as of 1998, more than 282 mil- lion specimens of human biological materials were stored in the United States, accumulating at a rate of more than 20 million cases per year (the term specimen refers to an individual quantity of material; several specimens can be obtained from one case, or individual, and several speci- mens can be obtained from one tissue biopsy or blood drawing).4 (See Table2 -1.) Each specimen of human tissue may be stored in multiple forms, such as slides, paraffin blocks, formalin-fixed, frozen, tissue culture, or extracted DNA.... In PAGE 36: ... NBAC has adopted the following definitions of human biological materials, depending on whether they are being stored in a repository or whether some of the material from a repository has been selected for research purposes. (See below and Table2 -2.) Repository collections include human biological materi- als (i.... In PAGE 38: ...e., in which findings are preliminary or in which no effective Table2 -2: Categories of Human Biological Materials Repository Collections Unidentified specimens: For these specimens, identifiable personal information was not collected or, if collected, was not maintained and cannot be retrieved by the repository. Identified specimens: These specimens are linked to per- sonal information in such a way that the person from whom the material was obtained could be identified by name, patient number, or clear pedigree location (i.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... 4. PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS Table1 shows performance of the baseline system, that was ob- tained directly using HMMs trained on clean speech material. Besides the very low performance provided when using the far-talk microphone signals, it is worth observing that also using close-talk signals a non satisfactory performance is obtained.... ..."

"... In PAGE 51: ... 3.2 WORKSHEETS FOR STEP 3 -- IDENTIFY THE INPUTS TO THE DECISION Table3 -1 defines the informational needs, data requirements, and data acquisition methods for this DQO process. Table 3-1.... In PAGE 51: ...2 WORKSHEETS FOR STEP 3 -- IDENTIFY THE INPUTS TO THE DECISION Table 3-1 defines the informational needs, data requirements, and data acquisition methods for this DQO process. Table3 -1. Informational Needs, Data Requirements, and Data Acquisition Methods.... In PAGE 52: ...Rev. 0 3-2 Table3 -1. Informational Needs, Data Requirements, and Data Acquisition Methods.... In PAGE 52: ... Analytical laboratory determination of radionuclide concentrations in soils followed by calculation of impact to the vadose zone, groundwater, and the Columbia River using the RESRAD model. Table3... In PAGE 53: ...Rev. 0 3-3 Table3 -2. List of Potential Computational Methods.... In PAGE 53: ... Yes 2, 5, and 6 None N/A N/A N/A 3, 4, and 7 RESRAD Manual for Implementing Residual Radioactive Material Guidelines, ANL/EAD/LD-2 (ANL 1993) Analytical laboratory determination of chemical and radionuclide concentrations in soils, surfaces of concrete and pipes, followed by calculation of impact to vadose zone soils, groundwater, and Columbia River using the RESRAD model. Yes N/A = not applicable Table3 -3 identifies the type of information needed to perform a quantitative assessment for the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 as having severe decision error consequences. Table 3-3.... In PAGE 53: ... Yes N/A = not applicable Table 3-3 identifies the type of information needed to perform a quantitative assessment for the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 as having severe decision error consequences. Table3 -3. Required Information for Quantitative Assessment.... In PAGE 54: ...Rev. 0 3-4 Table3 -3. Required Information for Quantitative Assessment.... In PAGE 54: ... Required Information for Quantitative Assessment. (2 pages) Required Information to Assess Impact Risk PSQ # - AA # Cost Human Health Ecological 5-2 Moderate Low Low 6-1 Low Low Low 6-2 High Low Low 7-1 Moderate Severe Severe 7-2 Moderate Low Low The sources for the information needed to resolve the PSQs are identified in Table3 -4 (e.g.... In PAGE 54: ... Existing appropriate data will be evaluated quantitatively in DQO Step 7. Table3 -4. Required Information and Reference Sources.... In PAGE 55: ...Rev. 0 3-5 Table3 -4. Required Information and Reference Sources.... In PAGE 56: ...Rev. 0 3-6 Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 57: ...Rev. 0 3-7 Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 58: ...Rev. 0 3-8 Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 58: ... c Based on 100 times the PRG for groundwater/Columbia River protection. N/A = not applicable TCLP = toxicity characteristic leachate procedure Table3 -6 lists the information needed to perform the DQO Step 6 quantitative assessment of the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 with severe decision error consequences. This information should evaluate the impact to cost, risk to human health and the environment, and schedule.... In PAGE 58: ... This information should evaluate the impact to cost, risk to human health and the environment, and schedule. Table3 -6. Quantitative Assessment of Decision Error Consequences.... In PAGE 59: ...Rev. 0 3-9 Table3 -6. Quantitative Assessment of Decision Error Consequences.... In PAGE 59: ...he level of analysis required (e.g., field screening or fixed laboratory). Table3 -7 develops a list of potentially appropriate measurement methods. Table 3-7.... In PAGE 59: ...he level of analysis required (e.g., field screening or fixed laboratory). Table 3-7 develops a list of potentially appropriate measurement methods. Table3 -7. Appropriate Measurement Methods.... In PAGE 61: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 11 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 62: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 12 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 63: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 13 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 64: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 14 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... ..."