"... In PAGE 51: ... 3.2 WORKSHEETS FOR STEP 3 -- IDENTIFY THE INPUTS TO THE DECISION Table3 -1 defines the informational needs, data requirements, and data acquisition methods for this DQO process. Table 3-1.... In PAGE 51: ...2 WORKSHEETS FOR STEP 3 -- IDENTIFY THE INPUTS TO THE DECISION Table 3-1 defines the informational needs, data requirements, and data acquisition methods for this DQO process. Table3 -1. Informational Needs, Data Requirements, and Data Acquisition Methods.... In PAGE 52: ...Rev. 0 3-2 Table3 -1. Informational Needs, Data Requirements, and Data Acquisition Methods.... In PAGE 52: ... Analytical laboratory determination of radionuclide concentrations in soils followed by calculation of impact to the vadose zone, groundwater, and the Columbia River using the RESRAD model. Table3... In PAGE 53: ...Rev. 0 3-3 Table3 -2. List of Potential Computational Methods.... In PAGE 53: ... Yes 2, 5, and 6 None N/A N/A N/A 3, 4, and 7 RESRAD Manual for Implementing Residual Radioactive Material Guidelines, ANL/EAD/LD-2 (ANL 1993) Analytical laboratory determination of chemical and radionuclide concentrations in soils, surfaces of concrete and pipes, followed by calculation of impact to vadose zone soils, groundwater, and Columbia River using the RESRAD model. Yes N/A = not applicable Table3 -3 identifies the type of information needed to perform a quantitative assessment for the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 as having severe decision error consequences. Table 3-3.... In PAGE 53: ... Yes N/A = not applicable Table 3-3 identifies the type of information needed to perform a quantitative assessment for the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 as having severe decision error consequences. Table3 -3. Required Information for Quantitative Assessment.... In PAGE 54: ...Rev. 0 3-4 Table3 -3. Required Information for Quantitative Assessment.... In PAGE 54: ... Required Information for Quantitative Assessment. (2 pages) Required Information to Assess Impact Risk PSQ # - AA # Cost Human Health Ecological 5-2 Moderate Low Low 6-1 Low Low Low 6-2 High Low Low 7-1 Moderate Severe Severe 7-2 Moderate Low Low The sources for the information needed to resolve the PSQs are identified in Table3 -4 (e.g.... In PAGE 54: ... Existing appropriate data will be evaluated quantitatively in DQO Step 7. Table3 -4. Required Information and Reference Sources.... In PAGE 55: ...Rev. 0 3-5 Table3 -4. Required Information and Reference Sources.... In PAGE 55: ... The actual numerical action level will be set in DQO Step 5. Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 57: ...Rev. 0 3-7 Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 58: ...Rev. 0 3-8 Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 58: ... c Based on 100 times the PRG for groundwater/Columbia River protection. N/A = not applicable TCLP = toxicity characteristic leachate procedure Table3 -6 lists the information needed to perform the DQO Step 6 quantitative assessment of the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 with severe decision error consequences. This information should evaluate the impact to cost, risk to human health and the environment, and schedule.... In PAGE 58: ... This information should evaluate the impact to cost, risk to human health and the environment, and schedule. Table3 -6. Quantitative Assessment of Decision Error Consequences.... In PAGE 59: ...Rev. 0 3-9 Table3 -6. Quantitative Assessment of Decision Error Consequences.... In PAGE 59: ...he level of analysis required (e.g., field screening or fixed laboratory). Table3 -7 develops a list of potentially appropriate measurement methods. Table 3-7.... In PAGE 59: ...he level of analysis required (e.g., field screening or fixed laboratory). Table 3-7 develops a list of potentially appropriate measurement methods. Table3 -7. Appropriate Measurement Methods.... In PAGE 61: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 11 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 62: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 12 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 63: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 13 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 64: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 14 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... ..."

"... In PAGE 51: ... 3.2 WORKSHEETS FOR STEP 3 -- IDENTIFY THE INPUTS TO THE DECISION Table3 -1 defines the informational needs, data requirements, and data acquisition methods for this DQO process. Table 3-1.... In PAGE 51: ...2 WORKSHEETS FOR STEP 3 -- IDENTIFY THE INPUTS TO THE DECISION Table 3-1 defines the informational needs, data requirements, and data acquisition methods for this DQO process. Table3 -1. Informational Needs, Data Requirements, and Data Acquisition Methods.... In PAGE 52: ...Rev. 0 3-2 Table3 -1. Informational Needs, Data Requirements, and Data Acquisition Methods.... In PAGE 52: ... Analytical laboratory determination of radionuclide concentrations in soils followed by calculation of impact to the vadose zone, groundwater, and the Columbia River using the RESRAD model. Table3... In PAGE 53: ...Rev. 0 3-3 Table3 -2. List of Potential Computational Methods.... In PAGE 53: ... Yes 2, 5, and 6 None N/A N/A N/A 3, 4, and 7 RESRAD Manual for Implementing Residual Radioactive Material Guidelines, ANL/EAD/LD-2 (ANL 1993) Analytical laboratory determination of chemical and radionuclide concentrations in soils, surfaces of concrete and pipes, followed by calculation of impact to vadose zone soils, groundwater, and Columbia River using the RESRAD model. Yes N/A = not applicable Table3 -3 identifies the type of information needed to perform a quantitative assessment for the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 as having severe decision error consequences. Table 3-3.... In PAGE 53: ... Yes N/A = not applicable Table 3-3 identifies the type of information needed to perform a quantitative assessment for the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 as having severe decision error consequences. Table3 -3. Required Information for Quantitative Assessment.... In PAGE 54: ...Rev. 0 3-4 Table3 -3. Required Information for Quantitative Assessment.... In PAGE 54: ... Required Information for Quantitative Assessment. (2 pages) Required Information to Assess Impact Risk PSQ # - AA # Cost Human Health Ecological 5-2 Moderate Low Low 6-1 Low Low Low 6-2 High Low Low 7-1 Moderate Severe Severe 7-2 Moderate Low Low The sources for the information needed to resolve the PSQs are identified in Table3 -4 (e.g.... In PAGE 54: ... Existing appropriate data will be evaluated quantitatively in DQO Step 7. Table3 -4. Required Information and Reference Sources.... In PAGE 55: ...Rev. 0 3-5 Table3 -4. Required Information and Reference Sources.... In PAGE 55: ... The actual numerical action level will be set in DQO Step 5. Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 56: ...Rev. 0 3-6 Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 58: ...Rev. 0 3-8 Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 58: ... c Based on 100 times the PRG for groundwater/Columbia River protection. N/A = not applicable TCLP = toxicity characteristic leachate procedure Table3 -6 lists the information needed to perform the DQO Step 6 quantitative assessment of the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 with severe decision error consequences. This information should evaluate the impact to cost, risk to human health and the environment, and schedule.... In PAGE 58: ... This information should evaluate the impact to cost, risk to human health and the environment, and schedule. Table3 -6. Quantitative Assessment of Decision Error Consequences.... In PAGE 59: ...Rev. 0 3-9 Table3 -6. Quantitative Assessment of Decision Error Consequences.... In PAGE 59: ...he level of analysis required (e.g., field screening or fixed laboratory). Table3 -7 develops a list of potentially appropriate measurement methods. Table 3-7.... In PAGE 59: ...he level of analysis required (e.g., field screening or fixed laboratory). Table 3-7 develops a list of potentially appropriate measurement methods. Table3 -7. Appropriate Measurement Methods.... In PAGE 61: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 11 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 62: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 12 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 63: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 13 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 64: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 14 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... ..."

"... In PAGE 51: ... 3.2 WORKSHEETS FOR STEP 3 -- IDENTIFY THE INPUTS TO THE DECISION Table3 -1 defines the informational needs, data requirements, and data acquisition methods for this DQO process. Table 3-1.... In PAGE 51: ...2 WORKSHEETS FOR STEP 3 -- IDENTIFY THE INPUTS TO THE DECISION Table 3-1 defines the informational needs, data requirements, and data acquisition methods for this DQO process. Table3 -1. Informational Needs, Data Requirements, and Data Acquisition Methods.... In PAGE 52: ...Rev. 0 3-2 Table3 -1. Informational Needs, Data Requirements, and Data Acquisition Methods.... In PAGE 52: ... Analytical laboratory determination of radionuclide concentrations in soils followed by calculation of impact to the vadose zone, groundwater, and the Columbia River using the RESRAD model. Table3... In PAGE 53: ...Rev. 0 3-3 Table3 -2. List of Potential Computational Methods.... In PAGE 53: ... Yes 2, 5, and 6 None N/A N/A N/A 3, 4, and 7 RESRAD Manual for Implementing Residual Radioactive Material Guidelines, ANL/EAD/LD-2 (ANL 1993) Analytical laboratory determination of chemical and radionuclide concentrations in soils, surfaces of concrete and pipes, followed by calculation of impact to vadose zone soils, groundwater, and Columbia River using the RESRAD model. Yes N/A = not applicable Table3 -3 identifies the type of information needed to perform a quantitative assessment for the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 as having severe decision error consequences. Table 3-3.... In PAGE 53: ... Yes N/A = not applicable Table 3-3 identifies the type of information needed to perform a quantitative assessment for the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 as having severe decision error consequences. Table3 -3. Required Information for Quantitative Assessment.... In PAGE 54: ...Rev. 0 3-4 Table3 -3. Required Information for Quantitative Assessment.... In PAGE 54: ... Required Information for Quantitative Assessment. (2 pages) Required Information to Assess Impact Risk PSQ # - AA # Cost Human Health Ecological 5-2 Moderate Low Low 6-1 Low Low Low 6-2 High Low Low 7-1 Moderate Severe Severe 7-2 Moderate Low Low The sources for the information needed to resolve the PSQs are identified in Table3 -4 (e.g.... In PAGE 54: ... Existing appropriate data will be evaluated quantitatively in DQO Step 7. Table3 -4. Required Information and Reference Sources.... In PAGE 55: ...Rev. 0 3-5 Table3 -4. Required Information and Reference Sources.... In PAGE 55: ... The actual numerical action level will be set in DQO Step 5. Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 56: ...Rev. 0 3-6 Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 57: ...Rev. 0 3-7 Table3 -5. Basis for Setting Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 58: ... c Based on 100 times the PRG for groundwater/Columbia River protection. N/A = not applicable TCLP = toxicity characteristic leachate procedure Table3 -6 lists the information needed to perform the DQO Step 6 quantitative assessment of the alternative actions identified in DQO Step 2 with severe decision error consequences. This information should evaluate the impact to cost, risk to human health and the environment, and schedule.... In PAGE 58: ... This information should evaluate the impact to cost, risk to human health and the environment, and schedule. Table3 -6. Quantitative Assessment of Decision Error Consequences.... In PAGE 59: ...Rev. 0 3-9 Table3 -6. Quantitative Assessment of Decision Error Consequences.... In PAGE 59: ...he level of analysis required (e.g., field screening or fixed laboratory). Table3 -7 develops a list of potentially appropriate measurement methods. Table 3-7.... In PAGE 59: ...he level of analysis required (e.g., field screening or fixed laboratory). Table 3-7 develops a list of potentially appropriate measurement methods. Table3 -7. Appropriate Measurement Methods.... In PAGE 61: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 11 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 62: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 12 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 63: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 13 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... In PAGE 64: ...I - 0129 3 Re v. 0 3- 14 Table3 -8. Analytical Performance Requirements.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ...Table 1: Preliminary Results To demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, we perform a preliminary simulation as shown in Table1 . We include 2,000 hosts and simulate the formation of 100 clubs, each of which has a capac- ity for 10 nodes.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ...mation with respect to different classifications. As a summary, Table2 illustrates a preliminary result of our discussion. It is not a complete one but can be served as a stepping stone for P2P infrastructures selection.... ..."

"... In PAGE 13: ...Figure 5: PCFG Experiment Architecture parsing and will hopefully give us some insight as to what will be the most useful parsing model to pursue. Table2 shows preliminary results for the two experiments. Super cially, the two methods produce nearly equivalent results.... In PAGE 15: ... 4.3 Comparing the results As the Table2 shows, there is not a signi cant di erence in the overall results. Because the primary focus of this research is in obtaining high-precision infor- mation, further experiments will need to outline in more detail the relationship between precision and recall for the various parsing methods.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... The spatial distribution of the area-demanding actors is performed by the model. Table1 shows the population and employment growth within the study region and for Vienna itself. Prior migration data show that the in-migration into the study region is mainly nurtured by the core city: by excluding intra-regional migration ca.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... It includes 237 sentences (2457 characters). In Table1 , it is clear that using the contextual information (Formula 3) only to select the most plausible candidate does not gain the advantages in these experiments. This is because the image processing module has the excellent performance and the test data (news) contains many proper nouns such as personal names and organizational names which are difficult to be solved by the language models.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... It includes 237 sentences (2457 characters). In Table1 , it is clear that using the contextual information (Formula 3) only to select the most plausible candidate does not gain the advantages in these experiments. This is because the image processing module has the excellent performance and the test data (news) contains many proper nouns such as personal names and organizational names which are difficult to be solved by the language models.... ..."