Results 1  10
of
246
Gravitoelectromagnetism versus electromagnetism
 Eur. J. Phys
, 2004
"... The paper contains a discussion of the properties of the gravitomagnetic interaction in non stationary conditions. A direct deduction of the equivalent of FaradayHenry law is given. A comparison is made between the gravitomagnetic and the electromagnetic induction, and it is shown that there is n ..."
Abstract

Cited by 3 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The paper contains a discussion of the properties of the gravitomagnetic interaction in non stationary conditions. A direct deduction of the equivalent of FaradayHenry law is given. A comparison is made between the gravitomagnetic and the electromagnetic induction, and it is shown
Gravitoelectromagnetism
, 1998
"... We develop and apply a fully covariant 1 + 3 electromagnetic analogy for gravity. The free gravitational field is covariantly characterized by the Weyl gravitoelectric and gravitomagnetic spatial tensor fields, whose dynamical equations are the Bianchi identities. Using a covariant generalization ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
We develop and apply a fully covariant 1 + 3 electromagnetic analogy for gravity. The free gravitational field is covariantly characterized by the Weyl gravitoelectric and gravitomagnetic spatial tensor fields, whose dynamical equations are the Bianchi identities. Using a covariant generalization
A gravitoelectromagnetic analogy . . .
, 2007
"... We propose a new approach to a physical analogy between General Relativity and Electromagnetism, based on tidal tensors of both theories. Using this approach we write a covariant form for the gravitational analogues of the Maxwell equations. The following realisations of the analogy are given. The f ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
and electromagnetism. We contrast our approach with the two gravitoelectromagnetic analogies commonly found in the literature, and argue that it sheds light on the debate about the limit of validity of one of the analogies, and clarifies issues concerning the physical interpretation of the other.
Gravitoelectromagnetic analogies
, 2014
"... We reexamine and further develop different gravitoelectromagnetic (GEM) analogies found in the literature, and clarify the connection between them. Special emphasis is placed in two exact physical analogies: the analogy based on inertial fields from the socalled “1+3 formalism”, and the analogy ba ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
We reexamine and further develop different gravitoelectromagnetic (GEM) analogies found in the literature, and clarify the connection between them. Special emphasis is placed in two exact physical analogies: the analogy based on inertial fields from the socalled “1+3 formalism”, and the analogy
Title THE GRAVITOELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE
"... Abstract – The best place to begin is with Einstein, who revolutionized understanding of gravity and said “time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter ” (this must include matter's electric charges and magnetic poles). Following the introductory paragraphs, Einstein&ap ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
to the electromagnetism of particles, resulting in electric charges that are positive or negative (combination of these two produces neutrality) and magnetic polarities being either north or south.
spacetimes: II. Decoupling gravitoelectromagnetic
, 2008
"... 2vector and scalar harmonic amplitudes ..."
Current Research in GravitoElectromagnetic Space Propulsion
"... Figure 1. The figure shows a combination of two pictures. The first one shows an artist’s concept of two Jupiter like planets, detected by NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope. Spitzer captured for the first time, February 2007, enough light to take the spectra of these two gas exoplanets, called HD 20945 ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
in the constellation Pegasus. The second picture, lower right, depicts the principle of gravitomagnetic space propulsion. For further explanations see Fig. 5 of this paper.
Holographic twostep gravitoelectromagnetic interaction and Dark Matter
"... Abstract. It is shown how misleading is the Einstein propagating photon, while the gravitationelectricity symmetry is patent in the holographic twostep intaraction scheme. in accordance with Coherent Cosmology and Eddington's Large Number prediction for the number of atoms in the Universe (13 ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. It is shown how misleading is the Einstein propagating photon, while the gravitationelectricity symmetry is patent in the holographic twostep intaraction scheme. in accordance with Coherent Cosmology and Eddington's Large Number prediction for the number of atoms in the Universe (136 x 2256). A simple natural interpretation for dark matter follows, as well as a graviton mass. The waveparticle dualism has never been correctly presented nor elucided. The origin of this conandrum is Einstein's paper on a 'propagating ' photon. A Nobel prize has been attributed to this, instead of the relativity papers, because it was known that Einstein was not the real discoverer of neither special relativity (attributed to Poincaré by Lorentz, and, later, by Whittaker) nor the generalized one. According to Leveugle [1], Hilbert published the correct equations 5 days before Einstein, several months after having sent a letter to Einstein, containing the solution of the Grossman's formulation of the problem. But the crucial part of the printer's proof in Hilbert's paper has been cut off by someone [1], and Hilbert was accused of plagiarism! The obvious reason why Hilbert did not seriously claim priority is that he was himself at the origin of the spoliation of the French physicist Poincaré for the profit of a German one, in the war atmosphere of the time. According to Leveugle [1], Hilbert asked Einstein (who was was suspected by Planck to be a plagiarist of Gibbs ' thermodynamics) to sign the famous 1905 relativity paper. Indeed, this text contains the word 'group structure', a term only specialized mathematician, as Hilbert, would know. Note that, with this obvious necessity of a 'group structure', the postulate of 'c' speed invariance is useless [2]. Moreover, the famous E = mc paper of this artificial 'genious', was, in reality [3], a demonstration of 0 = 0. Einstein himself recognized in a second paper on the subject (may 1906) that Poincaré has demontrated E = mc, as soon as 1900, in its full generality. The strange inactivity of the french colleagues of Poincaré is explained by the rivality between the
Results 1  10
of
246