Results 11 - 20 of 27,833

Table 1: Results for the three translation scenar- ios, using automatic and manual evaluation criteria. Standard deviations were measured at: 7.80 for the NIST score, 6.30 for the GTM score, and 0.31 for the adequacy score.

in Toward Communicating Simple Sentences Using Pictorial Representations
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 6: ... All the interpretations provided by the users were scored using the three evaluation measures: the GTM F-measure and the NIST scores, and the man- ually assessed adequacy. Table1 shows the evalu- ation results, averaged across all users and all sen-... In PAGE 8: ...Translation Score Analysis An analysis of the translation scores listed in Table1 reveals interesting aspects concerning the amount of understanding achieved for different translation scenarios. The score achieved through the pictorial transla- tions alone (S1) represents a large improvement over the score of 0 for the no communication baseline (which occurs when there are no means of commu- nication between the speakers).... ..."

Table 13. Uncertainty budget for NIST customer angle blocks

in Uncertainty and Dimensional Calibrations
by Ted Doiron, John Stoup
"... In PAGE 28: ...Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 12.8 Summary Table13 shows the uncertainty budget for angle block calibrations. The expanded uncertainty U (k=2) is U = 0.... ..."

Table 5: Restatement of some results on the Relevant part of the task in terms of the standard F-measure. The 10 top scores plus human and random results were distributed by NIST before the paper-submissions were due. The Novcol were recomputed.

in
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 6: ...) Just before the paper submission deadline, the Nov- elty Track organizers restated the results, using the standard F-measure instead of the product of precision and recall. a24 a17 a19 a8a25a12 a8a27a26a27a12 The recalculation raised the single-value scores of all groups, and squashed the results into a much narrower range for the automatic systems, as Table5 shows. The recalcuation also tended to eliminate the size of the ad- vantage to systems that generated larger summaries.... ..."

Table 2-1. NIST APP Specifications Summary for Data Management and Data Interchange

in unknown title
by unknown authors 1998
"... In PAGE 8: ...APP. Table2 -1 presents a subset of the NIST APP Specifications in the areas of Data Management and Data Interchange. DELIVERY SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Hardware, Software, Communications BUSINESS UNIT ARCHITECTURE Drives Prescribes Identifies INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DATA ARCHITECTURE All Supported by Enterprise Discretionary amp; Non-discretionary Standards, Requirements Feedback External Discretionary amp; Non-discretionary Standards, Requirements... ..."

Table 3 gives the average number of terms for the adhoc topics for each of the TRECs. The averages are broken down by field (title, description, narrative, and concept), with all four fields for TREC-1 and TREC-2, no concept field in TREC-3, and only a description field in TREC-4. The counts are shown both including and excluding the 23 standard stopwords used by the NIST ZPRISE system.

in Overview of the Fourth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-4)
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 6: ...W/O Stopwords TREC-1 (51-100) 149 99 title 6 5 description 44 27 narrative 71 41 concepts 28 26 TREC-2 (101-150) 178 125 title 7 7 description 47 30 narrative 87 54 concepts 37 34 TREC-3 (151-200) 119 70 title 6 6 description 30 18 narrative 83 46 TREC-4 (201-250) 16 10 description 16 10 Table3 : Topic Lengths Three different topic characteristics can be observed from this table. First, there is a length difference between the topics in TREC-1 and TREC-2.... ..."

Table 2: Time to recover passwords as specified by NIST Password Type Bits of Entropy Time to re-

in Password Exhaustion: Predicting the End of Password Usefulness
by Luke St. Clair, Lisa Johansen, William Enck, Matthew Pirretti, Patrick Traynor, Patrick Mcdaniel, Trent Jaeger
"... In PAGE 11: ... Note that all of these measurements assume full 8 character passwords, as the time to compromise with 7 or fewer characters became negligible. As shown in Table2 , in theory, a single machine should be able to recover a standard password in practice. Table 2: Time to recover passwords as specified by NIST Password Type Bits of Entropy Time to re-... In PAGE 11: ...The NIST estimates predict faster recovery than our experimental results show, though not by much. As Table2 shows, the average special-character and dictionary password takes 15 hours to recover. If our experimental results matched, we would expect to recover half the CSE passwords in 15 hours, indicating that the average password had been recovered.... ..."

Table 1: Cipher suite

in Fast Parallel Table Lookups to Accelerate Symmetric-Key Cryptography
by A. Murat Fiskiran , Ruby B. Lee
"... In PAGE 1: ... 2. Cipher suite The symmetric-key ciphers we consider in this study are shown in Table1 . AES is the NIST standard for block encryption and it is included in many widely- used security protocols such as IPSec, TLS, and SSH [1].... ..."

Table 3: Benchmarks and Data Sets Used For Evaluation. Hsfsys [14] is from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and noway [36] was written at the University of Sheffield. Nowsort was developed at the University of California-Berkeley. Ghostscript (gs) and ispell are well-known utilities. The final three benchmarks are from the SPECint95 benchmark suite [42]. Cache miss rates are for the SMALL-CONVENTIONAL model only and are meant, along with the percentage of instructions which are memory references (loads/stores), to give an overview of the memory behavior of each program.

in unknown title
by unknown authors 1997
"... In PAGE 5: ... 4.4 Simulations Table3 shows the applications we used for our evaluations. Each of these benchmarks is representative of current or potential future applications for a portable computing device.... ..."
Cited by 33

Table 1. Error rates on 10/45s utterances in the six-language-task (NIST apos;95)

in Double Bigram-Decoding In Phonotactic Language Identification
by Jirí Navrátil, Werner Zühlke 1997
"... In PAGE 3: ... The same languages also served as the six inner bigram languages due to the availability of their label-transcriptions in the OGI corpus. Table1 shows the resulting error rates for the system with six inner bigrams combined with language models consisting of 1) standard bigrams or 2) standard- and skip-grams, and of the second stage post-classifying two competing hypo- theses computed in the rst stage. For comparison, the performance of a conventional phonotactic component with null-grammar decoding is given also.... ..."
Cited by 2

Table 1. The microform geometry requirements of Rockwell diamond indenters and NIST expanded uncertainties (95 %)

in Microform Calibration Uncertainties of Rockwell Diamond Indenters
by Rockwell Diamond Indenters, J. F. Song, F. F. Rudder, T. V. Vorburger, J. H. Smith
"... In PAGE 4: ... Instrument Setup, Calibration and Check Standards, and Calibration Procedures The Rockwell diamond indenter is a diamond cone with 1208 of cone angle blended in a truly tangential manner with a spherical tip of 200 mm radius. The microform geometry and calibration requirements ac- cording to ISO and ASTM standards [2-4], are shown in Table1 . The working-grade indenters are used for the regular Rockwell hardness tests, while the calibration- grade indenters are reserved for calibrations of standard- ized hardness blocks.... In PAGE 12: ... The expanded uncertainty (95 %) is Um = 6tpum = 60.00858, less than 1/10 of the tolerance requirement for the calibration- grade Rockwell diamond indenters specified in ISO and ASTM standards ( Table1 ) [2,4]. 6.... In PAGE 13: ...0238 (95 %). This is less than 1/10 of the tolerance requirement for calibra- tion-grade diamond indenters ( Table1 ). This value may also be reduced further by improving the rotary stage alignment.... ..."
Results 11 - 20 of 27,833