and other research outputs

agricultural research centers that receive principal funding from governments, private foundations, and international and regional organizations, most of which are members of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTORS AND PARTNERS IFPRI’s research

The Centre for Health Program Evaluation (CHPE) is a research and teaching organisation

agricultural research centers that receive principal funding from governments, private foundations, and international and regional organizations, most of which are members of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).

Routinely-collected general practice data are complex, but with systematic processing can be used for quality improvement and research

agricultural research centers that receive principal funding from governments, private foundations, and international and regional organizations, most of which are members of the Consultative Group on

The Centre for Health Program Evaluation (CHPE) is a research and teaching orga isation established in 1990 to: · undertake academic and applied research into health programs, health systems and current policy issues; · develop appropriate evaluation methodologies; and · promote the teaching

Abstract: This paper explores on going research into the Intelligent City as part of a wider EU 6 th Framework Information Society Technology funded research and development project. Intelligent Cities (IntelCities) aims to pool advanced knowledge and experience of electronic government, planning

RESEARCH INTERESTS My research broadly falls into the general areas of parallel and distributed computing. Specifically, I focus on three areas: (i) parallel programming models and other middleware (MPI, global address space models, sockets, file-systems, web-based data-center middleware); (ii

about their attitudes to primary prevention and their ability to provide advice on various aspects of patients ’ life-styles and behaviour. The results show that, for eight out of nine areas of patients ’ behaviour, the doctors generally thought it was highly appropri-ate for them to provide advice. Doubts were expressed about appropriateness and their com-petence in providing advice to patients concerning coping with poverty. There were some small dif-ferences in the responses which were related to the ages and personal life-styles of the doctors, and between those working in inner city and rural prac-tices. The categories of patients which were rated as most important to be recipients of health education were the high-risk groups of smokers, drug injectors