Results 21 - 30
of
5,069
Table 1. Figure 2 shows the distribution of the number of clients measured by each of the 47 traceroute gateways. Most of the traceroute gateways measured hop-counts to more than 40,000 clients.
"... In PAGE 4: ...Sample Number Commercial sites 11 Educational sites 4 Non-profit sites 2 Foreign sites 18 .net sites 12 Table1 : Diversity of traceroute gateway locations. To obtain actual hop-count distributions, we use the raw traceroute data from 50 different traceroute gate- ways in [11].... ..."
Table 3: Basic research as a percentage of R amp;D performed by each sector (%)
"... In PAGE 6: ... While the relative share of academia in overall basic research expenditures has decreased, the higher education sector is the only sector mainly devoted to basic research. At the OECD aggregated level, the percentage of basic research performed in total R amp;D has increased between 1981 and 2003 within all performing sectors; by 19% in the private non-profit sector, whose share of basic research expenditures were just below 50% in 2003; by 8% in the higher education and in the government sectors; and by 1% only in businesses ( Table3 ). The capitalisation of the business sector explains that a seemingly insignificant growth has significant effects in the distribution of knowledge between sectors.... ..."
Table 5. Average duration visit, number of visits, and exposure to primary medical care in previous 12 months by practice type (age-standardised)
"... In PAGE 74: ...e. traditional general practices) ( Table5 ). This difference persisted across NZDep quintiles 1 and 5.... In PAGE 74: ... While the average number of practice visits did not differ significantly, the overall exposure to primary medical care did vary across practice types in the univariate analyses (age adjusted), with total annual exposure being higher in non-profit practices by nearly 20 minutes (p lt;0.01) ( Table5 ). This difference across practice types increased to 23.... In PAGE 74: ...2 minutes for patients living in NZDep quintile 5 areas (p=0.02) ( Table5 ). However, in the multivariate analyses, exposure to primary medical care did not vary significantly across practice types after controlling for all co-variates (Table 6).... ..."
Table 3 summarizes a collection of 31 social surveys or reports of surveys concerning the digital divide, 30 from the U.S. and one from the U.K. These surveys are coded according to whether they are national or local, whether the unit of analysis is some type of individual/household or some type of community institution, and who collected the data.
"... In PAGE 6: ...Table3 . Selected digital divide surveys Citation (note that year of citation may not equal year of data collection) NUnit of Analysi National or Local Individual or Community Institution Dataset Kominski 1999 50,000 Households N I government McConnaughey 1995 54,000 Households N I government Birdsell 1998 15,000 in 15 different surveys Individuals N I commercial McConnaughey 1998 48,000 Households N I government Chow 1998 817 Users of community technology centers N I non-profit Falling through the Net 1999 48,000 Households N I government John J.... ..."
Table 3. Top 25 hits obtained by searching the PDB using the helix-turn-helix motif as the query
"... In PAGE 9: ... We tested the ability of our program to detect small structural motifs within proteins by searching a representative set of the PDB using the helix-turn-helix and EF-hand motifs as query structures. The results for the helix-turn-helix motif ( Table3 ) show that the program correctly ranked the proteins that contained this motif (mostly DNA binding proteins) at the top of the list. LOCK will be made available to academic and non- profit institutions by request to the authors.... ..."
Table 1. Distribution of Facilities at Beginning and End of Study Period
2003
"... In PAGE 17: ... We coded acquisitions as cases in which corporate ownership of a nursing home changed between inspection periods. Table1 reports the distribution of different types of facilities during the study period. Part A of the table reports that there were more than 18,000 facilities in the sample at the end of the study period (column 1b).... In PAGE 17: ... The remaining facilities (6%) were owned by government entities such as counties and cities. ********** Table1 about here ********** Part B of Table 1 reports mean performance of the different types of facilities, reporting health deficiencies (column 2a) and staffing levels (column 2b). Health deficiencies are the number of deficiencies that state inspectors report during annual inspections of a facility.... In PAGE 17: ... The remaining facilities (6%) were owned by government entities such as counties and cities. ********** Table 1 about here ********** Part B of Table1 reports mean performance of the different types of facilities, reporting health deficiencies (column 2a) and staffing levels (column 2b). Health deficiencies are the number of deficiencies that state inspectors report during annual inspections of a facility.... In PAGE 17: ... As a result, staffing ratios are a major indicator of efficiency. The raw means of the performance indicators in Table1 are a useful start for the comparisons. They report that non-profit facilities have fewer deficiencies and higher staffing than for-profit facilities (government-owned facilities are similar to the non-profit levels).... In PAGE 18: ... However, both staffing and quality can be affected by resident case mix and payment models, so that we will need multivariate analysis to determine whether the differences are intrinsic to the organizational forms or whether they result from differential populations of residents. Part C of Table1 reports the distribution of residents by payment source in different classes of facilities. The interesting point here is that non-profit facilities have a substantially higher proportion of Medicare and private-pay residents than for-profit homes.... In PAGE 18: ... In particular, private payment status lasts as long as residents have financial resources to draw on, after which they convert to Medicaid status. Part D of Table1 reports 1996-1997 performance levels of facilities that entered during the study period. Columns 4c and 4d show that they tended to have fewer deficiencies and higher staffing than comparable facilities.... In PAGE 19: ... We note that the results are robust to including other facility, market, and state characteristics. The multivariate results in Table 2 are consistent with the raw means in Table1 . For- profit facilities have higher deficiencies and lower staffing.... In PAGE 25: ... Perhaps reassuringly, then, the data suggest that such entry did occur during the study period. Part D of Table1 reported that the raw numbers of non-profit entrants were sufficient to replace those that closed or were acquired by for-profit chains. Moreover, the entrants achieved at least average deficiency and staffing levels (Tables 1 and 2), rather than emulating the lower levels of their for-profit competitors.... ..."
Table 2. Consumer organization and the number of provider organizations.
"... In PAGE 5: ... Note that an organization can be both a consumer and a provider of job service. Table2 shows the data of how many provider organizations have been used by the consumers. Table 2.... In PAGE 5: ...AIST 4 ASCC 3 CICESE 1 MU 5 NCSA 1 NTU 7 SDSC 7 UNAM 1 USM 1 UZurich 1 According to the data shown in Table2 , we can get the PD index: PD index = (31/7)/10 = 0.44 Thus, on average an organization use about half of the number of providers in the Grid environment of PRAGMA.... ..."
Table 2: Organization Size of Responding Organizations
"... In PAGE 5: ...4%] 13 [3.8%] Total 119 140 85 344 Table 1: Respondent Position Profile Table2 shows the organization size (number of employees) of the responding organizations while the descriptive statistics for the independent variables in our research model are reported in table 3. A one way ANOVA was used to detect any differences in mean values of the independent variables between the three regions.... ..."
Table 7: Sharing Organization
"... In PAGE 10: ... The sharing of knowledge organization can be accomplished with the speci cation of connectivity between logical information spaces. Sharing organization between two logical spaces is visualize in Table7 in terms of elaborated conceptual knowledge systems. The rst logical space makes use of the organization of the second logical space by specifying the link connectivity sharing1;2.... ..."
Results 21 - 30
of
5,069