Results 1 - 10 of 33,715

Table 23. Candidate Dose-Effect Categories for In-Depth Analysis

in Sensitivity Specificity Threshold and saturation
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 35: ... With the other covariates controlled, sulfur dioxide was a significant predictor. Table23 shows that mortality was 1.5 percent less than expected on 232 days with SO2 concentrations below 30 ug/m3, and 2 percent greater than expected on 260 days with SO2 concentrations above 500 pg/m3.... ..."

Table 1 The G and P genotypes of 76 rotavirus strains subjected to in-depth analysis

in
by P. Valentiner-branth, C K. Mølbak, C H. Sommerfelt, N. Munk Nielsen F 2002
"... In PAGE 2: ... A total of 45 specimens (59%) contained mixed infections, with G2G8 and G2G9 as the most fre- quent combinations (Fig. 1 and Table1 ). The cultivated strains proved to be P[6], G2; P[4], G8; and P[6], G2G8 and two specimens yielded P[4]P[8], G2.... ..."

Table 3. In-depth Reduct Analysis (top three results are emphasized). Refer to Section 3 for attribute abbreviation definitions. (At- tributes additionally labelled with d refer to the discretized rankings)

in Consumer Modelling in Support of Interface Design
by Timothy J. Maciag, Dominik Slezak, Daryl H. Hepting
"... In PAGE 7: ...sonalized user interfaces quickly and with ease. Based on the results described in Table3 , three of the ten reducts (in bold text) provide highly successful classification accuracy and coverage. Thus, a decision support tool could be de- signed to randomly choose one of these three reducts to ob- tain consumer information.... In PAGE 7: ... Thus, a decision support tool could be de- signed to randomly choose one of these three reducts to ob- tain consumer information. Since consumers would only be required to state their preferences according to those at- tributes belonging to one of the randomly chosen reducts in Table3 , the consumers will gain a customizable, person- alized user interface quickly, highlighting those attributes that the consumer values and products that they may con- sider purchasing. Thus, the consumers will be able to focus solely on their immediate decision task(s), increasing their chances of formulating satisfactory decision outcome(s).... ..."
Cited by 3

TABLE 2 IN-DEPTH INTERVIEW CONSTRUCTION

in What's in a Name? (Stakeholder Perceptions of Engineering Programmes)
by Peter Scallan, Steve Gallagher, The Uk

Table 5. Remedial action (construction) costs: demonstration and full-scale

in DOE/EM-0577 Well Injection Depth Extraction (WIDE) Soil Flushing Industry Programs Prepared for
by Department Of Energy, Prepared For, Doe Ohio, Field Office
"... In PAGE 19: ... The cost information provided here is based on the first 8 months of operation. The demonstration costs and projected full-scale costs are presented in Table5 for the Remedial Action (construction) and Table 6 for Operation and Maintenance (O amp;M). These projected costs for the full-scale WIDE system are described in... ..."

Table 3.2 In-Depth Overview of Models Reviewed

in TABLE OF CONTENTS
by Chetan Agarwal, Glen M. Green, J. Morgan Grove, Tom P. Evans, Charles M. Schweik, Usda Forest Service

Table 3.2 In-Depth Overview of Models Reviewed

in TABLE OF CONTENTS
by Chetan Agarwal, Glen M. Green, J. Morgan Grove, Tom P. Evans, Charles M. Schweik, Usda Forest Service

Table 3.2 In-Depth Overview of Models Reviewed

in TABLE OF CONTENTS
by Chetan Agarwal, Glen M. Green, J. Morgan Grove, Tom P. Evans, Charles M. Schweik, Usda Forest Service

Table 3.2 In-Depth Overview of Models Reviewed

in TABLE OF CONTENTS
by Chetan Agarwal, Glen M. Green, J. Morgan Grove, Tom P. Evans, Charles M. Schweik, Usda Forest Service

Table 3.2 In-Depth Overview of Models Reviewed

in TABLE OF CONTENTS
by Chetan Agarwal, Glen M. Green, J. Morgan Grove, Tom P. Evans, Charles M. Schweik, Usda Forest Service
Results 1 - 10 of 33,715