MetaCartSign in to MyCiteSeer

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

  Feature transformation by function decomposition

Download:
Download as a PDF | Download as a PS
by H. Liu, M. Motoda, Blaz Zupan, Marko Bohanec, Janez Demsar, Ivan Bratko
ftp://garovix.ijs.si/pub/papers/bz/ieee_ex97.ps.gz
Add To MetaCart

Abstract:

While not explicitly intended for feature transformation, some methods for switching circuit design implicitly deal with this problem. Given a tabulated Boolean function, these methods construct a circuit that implements that function. In 1950s and 1960s, Ashenhurst [1] and Curtis [2] proposed a function decomposition method that develops a switching circuit by constructing a nested hierarchy of tabulated Boolean functions. Both the hierarchy and the functions themselves are discovered by the decomposition method and are not given in advance. This is especially important from the viewpoint of feature construction, since the outputs of such functions can be regarded as new features not present in the original problem description. The basic principle of function decomposition is the following. Let a tabulated function y = F (X) use a set of input features X = x 1; : : : ; x n. The goal is to decompose this function into y = G(A; H(B)), where A and B are subsets of features in X such that A [ B = X. G and H are tabulated functions that are determined by the decomposition and are not predefined. Their

Citations

3215 C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning – Quinlan - 1993
128 The Decomposition of Switching Function – Ashenhurst - 1957
22 A new approach to the decomposition of incompletely specified functions based on graph-coloring and local transformations and its application to FPGA mapping – Wan, Perkowski - 1992
17 Machine learning by function decomposition – Zupan, Bohanec, et al. - 1997
12 A New Approach to the Design of Switching Functions – Curtis - 1962
12 Pattern theoretic feature extraction and constructive induction – Ross, Noviskey, et al. - 1994
3 Estimating attributes – Kononenko - 1994
1 Thrun et al., "A performance comparison of di#erent learning algorithms – B - 1991
1 is a research assistant at Jozef Stefan Institute – Zupan
1 Bohanec is a research associate at Jozef Stefan Institute – Marko
1 Bratko is a professor of computer science at the Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. He heads the AI laboratories at Jozef Stefan Institute and the University. He is the chairman of ISSEK, International School f – Ivan - 1986