Download:
by Sencun Zhu, Sanjeev Setia, Sushil Jajodia
in IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
http://mason.gmu.edu/~szhu1/ilhap.pdf
Add To MetaCart
Abstract:
Sensor networks are often deployed in unattended environments, thus leaving these networks vulnerable to false data injection attacks in which an adversary injects false data into the network with the goal of deceiving the base station or depleting the resources of the relaying nodes. Standard authentication mechanisms cannot prevent this attack if the adversary has compromised one or a small number of sensor nodes. In this paper, we present an interleaved hop-by-hop authentication scheme that guarantees that the base station will detect any injected false data packets when no more than a certain number t nodes are compromised. Further, our scheme provides an upper bound B for the number of hops that a false data packet could be forwarded before it is detected and dropped, given that there are up to t colluding compromised nodes. We show that in the worst case B is O(t 2). We also propose a variant of this scheme which guarantees B = 0 and works for a small t. Through performance analysis, we show that our scheme is efficient with respect to the security it provides, and it also allows a tradeoff between security and performance. 1.
Citations
|
880
|
System Architecture Directions for Networked Sensors
– Hill, Szewczyk, et al.
- 2000
|
|
480
|
How to construct random functions
– Goldreich, Goldwasser, et al.
- 1986
|
|
320
|
SPINS: Security protocols for sensor networks
– Perrig, Szewczyk, et al.
- 2001
|
|
236
|
A key-management scheme for distributed sensor networks
– Eschenauer, Gligor
- 2002
|
|
233
|
Random key predistribution schemes for sensor networks
– Chan, Perrig, et al.
- 2003
|
|
216
|
Password authentication with insecure communication
– Lamport
- 1981
|
|
163
|
A pairwise key pre-distribution scheme for wireless sensor networks
– Du, Deng, et al.
|
|
160
|
GHT: a geographic hash table for data-centric storage
– Ratnasamy, Karp, et al.
- 2002
|
|
157
|
Establishing pairwise keys in distributed sensor networks
– Liu, Ning
|
|
118
|
LEAP: Efficient Security Mechanisms for Large-Scale Distributed Sensor Networks
– Zhu, Setia, et al.
- 2003
|
|
106
|
An optimal class of symmetric key generation systems
– Blom
- 1987
|
|
99
|
XOR MACs: New methods for message authentication using nite pseudorandom functions
– Bellare, Guerin, et al.
- 1995
|
|
96
|
PerfectlySecure Key Distribution for Dynamic Conferences
– Blundo, Santis, et al.
- 1998
|
|
77
|
SIA: Secure information aggregation in sensor networks
– Przydatek, Song, et al.
- 2003
|
|
70
|
Secure pebblenets
– Basagni, Herrin, et al.
- 2001
|
|
52
|
Establishing Pairwise Keys For Secure Communication in Ad Hoc Networks: A Probabilistic Approach
– Zhu, Xu, et al.
|
|
40
|
Secure Aggregation for Wireless Networks
– Hu, Evans
|
|
36
|
Location-based pairwise key establishments of static sensor networks
– Liu, Ning
- 2003
|
|
27
|
Secure Routing in Sensor Networks: Attacks and Countermeasures
– Karlof, Wagner
- 2003
|
|
16
|
Statistical en-route detection and filtering of injected false data in sensor networks
– Ye, Luo, et al.
- 2004
|
|
7
|
Integrity Preservation for Communication in Sensor Networks
– Vogt
- 2004
|