High-Level Perception, Representation, and Analogy: A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Methodology (1992)
| Venue: | Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence |
| Citations: | 71 - 6 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Chalmers92high-levelperception,,
author = {David J. Chalmers and Robert M. French and Douglas R. Hofstadter},
title = {High-Level Perception, Representation, and Analogy: A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Methodology},
journal = {Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1992},
volume = {4},
pages = {185--211}
}
Years of Citing Articles
OpenURL
Abstract
High-level perception—the process of making sense of complex data at an abstract, conceptual level—is fundamental to human cognition. Through high-level perception, chaotic environmen-tal stimuli are organized into the mental representations that are used throughout cognitive pro-cessing. Much work in traditional artificial intelligence has ignored the process of high-level perception, by starting with hand-coded representations. In this paper, we argue that this dis-missal of perceptual processes leads to distorted models of human cognition. We examine some existing artificial-intelligence models—notably BACON, a model of scientific discovery, and the Structure-Mapping Engine, a model of analogical thought—and argue that these are flawed pre-cisely because they downplay the role of high-level perception. Further, we argue that perceptu-al processes cannot be separated from other cognitive processes even in principle, and therefore that traditional artificial-intelligence models cannot be defended by supposing the existence of a “representation module ” that supplies representations ready-made. Finally, we describe a model of high-level perception and analogical thought in which perceptual processing is integrated with analogical mapping, leading to the flexible build-up of representations appropriate to a given context. 1 The Problem of Perception One of the deepest problems in cognitive science is that of understanding how people make sense of the vast amount of raw data constantly bombarding them from their environment. The essence of human perception lies in the ability of the mind to hew order from this chaos, whether this means simply detecting movement in the visual field, recognizing sadness in a tone of voice, perceiving a threat on a chessboard, or coming to understand the Iran–Contra affair in terms of







