Subset coercions in Coq (2006)
| Venue: | In Selected papers from the International Workshop on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES’06 |
| Citations: | 31 - 2 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Sozeau06subsetcoercions,
author = {Matthieu Sozeau},
title = {Subset coercions in Coq},
booktitle = {In Selected papers from the International Workshop on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES’06},
year = {2006},
pages = {237--252},
publisher = {Springer}
}
Years of Citing Articles
Bookmark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
OpenURL
Abstract
Abstract. We propose a new language for writing programs with dependent types which can be elaborated into partial Coq terms. This language permits to establish a phase distinction between writing and proving algorithms in the Coq environment. Concretely, this means allowing to write algorithms as easily as in a practical functional programming language whilst giving them as rich a specification as desired and proving that the code meets the specification using the whole Coq proof apparatus. This is achieved by extending conversion to an equivalence which relates types and subsets based on them, a technique originating from the “Predicate subtyping ” feature of PVS and following mathematical convention. The typing judgements can be translated to the Calculus of (Co-)Inductive Constructions (Cic) by means of an interpretation which inserts coercions at the appropriate places. These coercions can contain existential variables representing the propositional parts of the final term, corresponding to proof obligations (or PVS type-checking conditions). A prototype implementation of this process is integrated with the Coq environment. 1
