DMCA
Hardware Fault Containment in Scalable Shared-Memory Multiprocessors (1997)
| Venue: | Proc. of the 24th ISCA |
| Citations: | 26 - 3 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Teodosiu97hardwarefault,
author = {Dan Teodosiu and Joel Baxter and Kinshuk Govil and John Chapin and Mendel Rosenblum and Mark Horowitz},
title = {Hardware Fault Containment in Scalable Shared-Memory Multiprocessors},
booktitle = {Proc. of the 24th ISCA},
year = {1997},
pages = {73--84}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
Current shared-memory multiprocessors are inherently vulnerable to faults: any significant hardware or system software fault causes the entire system to fail. Unless provisions are made to limit the impact of faults, users will perceive a decrease in reliability when they entrust their applications to larger machines. This paper shows that fault containment techniques can be effectively applied to scalable shared-memory multiprocessors to reduce the reliability problems created by increased machine size. The primary goal of our approach is to leave normal-mode performance unaffected. Rather than using expensive faulttolerance techniques to mask the effects of data and resource loss, our strategy is based on limiting the damage caused by faults to only a portion of the machine. After a hardware fault, we run a distributed recovery algorithm that allows normal operation to be resumed in the functioning parts of the machine. Our approach is implemented in the Stanford FLASH multiprocessor. Using a detailed hardware simulator, we have performed a number of fault injection experiments on a FLASH system running Hive, an operating system designed to support fault containment. The results we report validate our approach and show that in conjunction with an operating system like Hive, we can improve the reliability seen by unmodified applications without substantial performance cost. Simulation results suggest that our algorithms scale well for systems up to 128 processors.
Keyphrases
scalable shared-memory multiprocessor hardware fault containment operating system system software fault reliability problem algorithm scale well hardware fault fault injection experiment increased machine size expensive faulttolerance technique stanford flash multiprocessor flash system normal operation resource loss current shared-memory multiprocessor fault containment technique detailed hardware simulator functioning part substantial performance cost normal-mode performance simulation result entire system fault containment unmodified application significant hardware primary goal distributed recovery algorithm
