DMCA
A.: Don’t like RDF reification? Making statements about statements using singleton property (2014)
| Venue: | In: Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. on World Wide Web (WWW’14). ACM |
| Citations: | 4 - 0 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Nguyen14a.:don’t,
author = {Vinh Nguyen and Olivier Bodenreider and Amit Sheth},
title = {A.: Don’t like RDF reification? Making statements about statements using singleton property},
booktitle = {In: Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. on World Wide Web (WWW’14). ACM},
year = {2014}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
Statements about RDF statements, or meta triples, provide additional information about individual triples, such as the source, the occurring time or place, or the certainty. In-tegrating such meta triples into semantic knowledge bases would enable the querying and reasoning mechanisms to be aware of provenance, time, location, or certainty of triples. However, an efficient RDF representation for such meta knowl-edge of triples remains challenging. The existing standard reification approach allows such meta knowledge of RDF triples to be expressed using RDF by two steps. The first step is representing the triple by a Statement instance which has subject, predicate, and object indicated separately in three different triples. The second step is creating assertions about that instance as if it is a statement. While reification
Keyphrases
singleton property rdf reification meta knowl-edge rdf statement individual triple different triple semantic knowledge base second step rdf triple statement instance standard reification approach meta knowledge first step in-tegrating meta triple efficient rdf representation meta triple occurring time additional information
