DMCA
Participation and accountability in development management (2003)
| Venue: | The Journal of Development Studies |
| Citations: | 22 - 0 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Brett03participationand,
author = {E. A. Brett},
title = {Participation and accountability in development management},
journal = {The Journal of Development Studies},
year = {2003},
pages = {1--29}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
This article critically reviews the role of participatory theory in managing development projects and programmes in poor countries. Participation has emerged in response to global demands for greater individual and social control over the activities of state and private agencies, and especially to the manifest failures of traditional ‘top-down ’ management systems in LDCs. Claims made on behalf of these participatory methodologies are critically reviewed and a distinction is drawn between strong and weak versions of the theory. Empirical evidence is then considered to evaluate the effectiveness of these methodologies, using long-standing insights of social science theory to show that participation can succeed for specific kinds of projects and programmes in favourable circumstances, but is unsuitable for many others. It commonly fails in contexts where local conditions make co-operative and collective action very difficult, or where it is manipulated by implementing agencies to justify their own actions or poor performance. Neither the strong nor the weak understandings of participation in current literature take full account of the fact that these problems can only be avoided by combining hierarchy and expertise with participation in management systems. Participation will only be successful in producing good organisational performance when it is operationalised through institutional arrangements which maximise the accountability of agencies to
Keyphrases
development management participatory theory specific kind good organisational performance favourable circumstance development project traditional top-down management system social control private agency current literature empirical evidence global demand weak understanding many others weak version full account institutional arrangement management system poor performance long-standing insight local condition poor country collective action social science theory participatory methodology
