DMCA
Living with CLASSIC: When and How to Use a KL-ONE-Like Language (1991)
| Venue: | Principles of Semantic Networks |
| Citations: | 256 - 17 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Brachman91livingwith,
author = {Ronald J. Brachman and Deborah L. McGuinness and Peter F. Patel-Schneider and Lori A. Resnick and Lori Alperin Resnick and Alexander Borgida},
title = {Living with CLASSIC: When and How to Use a KL-ONE-Like Language},
booktitle = {Principles of Semantic Networks},
year = {1991},
pages = {401--456},
publisher = {Morgan Kaufmann}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
classic is a recently-developed knowledge representation system that follows the paradigm originally set out in the kl-one system: it concentrates on the definition of structured concepts, their organization into taxonomies, the creation and manipulation of individual instances of such concepts, and the key inferences of subsumption and classification. Rather than simply presenting a description of classic, we complement a brief system overview with a discussion of how to live within the confines of a limited object-oriented deductive system. By analyzing the representational strengths and weaknesses of classic, we consider the circumstances under which it is most appropriate to use (or not use) it. We elaborate a knowledge-engineering methodology for building kl-one-style knowledge bases, with emphasis on the modeling choices that arise in the process of describing a domain. We also address some of the key difficult issues encountered by new users, including primitive vs. d...
Keyphrases
kl-one-like language modeling choice kl-one-style knowledge base limited object-oriented deductive system individual instance new user knowledge-engineering methodology recently-developed knowledge representation system representational strength kl-one system key difficult issue structured concept key inference brief system overview primitive v
