• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

DMCA

Disgust and the Moralization of Purity

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [wjh.harvard.edu]
  • [ist-socrates.berkeley.edu]
  • [socrates.berkeley.edu]
  • [socrates.berkeley.edu]
  • [ist-socrates.berkeley.edu]
  • [wjh.harvard.edu]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by E. J. Horberg , Dacher Keltner , Christopher Oveis , Adam B. Cohen
Citations:30 - 4 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Horberg_disgustand,
    author = {E. J. Horberg and Dacher Keltner and Christopher Oveis and Adam B. Cohen},
    title = {Disgust and the Moralization of Purity},
    year = {}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Guided by appraisal-based models of the influence of emotion upon judgment, we propose that disgust moralizes—that is, amplifies the moral significance of—protecting the purity of the body and soul. Three studies documented that state and trait disgust, but not other negative emotions, moralize the purity moral domain but not the moral domains of justice or harm/care. In Study 1, integral feelings of disgust, but not integral anger, predicted stronger moral condemnation of behaviors violating purity. In Study 2, experimentally induced disgust, compared with induced sadness, increased condemnation of behaviors violating purity and increased approval of behaviors upholding purity. In Study 3, trait disgust, but not trait anger or trait fear, predicted stronger condemnation of purity violations and greater approval of behaviors upholding purity. We found that, confirming the domain specificity of the disgust–purity association, disgust was unrelated to moral judgments about justice (Studies 1 and 2) or harm/care (Study 3). Finally, across studies, individuals of lower socioeconomic status (SES) were more likely than individuals of higher SES to moralize purity but not justice or harm/care.

Keyphrases

harm care    trait disgust    integral feeling    moral judgment    disgust purity association    moral significance    induced sadness    integral anger    trait fear    appraisal-based model    trait anger    moral domain    purity moral domain    moral condemnation    socioeconomic status    induced disgust    increased condemnation    purity violation    domain specificity    negative emotion   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University