Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing protocols for Ad Hoc Networks

DMCA

Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing protocols for Ad Hoc Networks (2001)

Cached

Download Links

Other Repositories/Bibliography

DBLP

by Charles Perkins , Charles E. Perkins Nokia , Elizabeth M. Royer , Samir R. Das , Mahesh K. Marina

Citations:

254 - 1 self

BibTeX

@MISC{Perkins01performancecomparison,
    author = {Charles Perkins and Charles E. Perkins Nokia and Elizabeth M. Royer and Samir R. Das and Mahesh K. Marina},
    title = {Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing protocols for Ad Hoc Networks},
    year = {2001}
}

OpenURL

Abstract

Ad hoc networks are characterized by multihop wireless connectivity, frequently changing network topology and the need for efficient dynamic routing protocols. We compare the performance of two prominent on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks: Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV). A detailed simulation model with MAC and physical layer models is used to study interlayer interactions and their performance implications. We demonstrate that even though DSR and AODV share similar ondemand behavior, the differences in the protocol mechanics can lead to significant performance differentials. The performance differentials are analyzed using varying network load, mobility, and network size. Based on the observations, we make recommendations about how the performance of either protocol can be improved.

Keyphrases

ad hoc network on-demand routing protocol performance comparison performance implication mobile ad hoc network multihop wireless connectivity network size efficient dynamic routing protocol detailed simulation model aodv share similar ondemand behavior dynamic source routing physical layer model performance differential network load protocol mechanic significant performance differential prominent on-demand routing protocol network topology interlayer interaction

DMCA