• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

DMCA

Clock Rate versus IPC: The End of the Road for Conventional Microarchitectures (2000)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [ftp.cs.utexas.edu]
  • [www.cs.utah.edu]
  • [www.cs.utah.edu]
  • [www.cs.utah.edu]
  • [systems.cs.colorado.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [ziyang.eecs.umich.edu]
  • [maggini.eng.umd.edu]
  • [systems.cs.colorado.edu]
  • [ziyang.eecs.umich.edu]
  • [www.cs.utexas.edu]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Vikas Agarwal , M.S. Hrishikesh , Stephen W. Keckler , Doug Burger
Citations:324 - 23 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Agarwal00clockrate,
    author = {Vikas Agarwal and M.S. Hrishikesh and Stephen W. Keckler and Doug Burger},
    title = {Clock Rate versus IPC: The End of the Road for Conventional Microarchitectures},
    year = {2000}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

The doubling of microprocessor performance every three years has been the result of two factors: more transistors per chip and superlinear scaling of the processor clock with technology generation. Our results show that, due to both diminishing improvements in clock rates and poor wire scaling as semiconductor devices shrink, the achievable performance growth of conventional microarchitectures will slow substantially. In this paper, we describe technology-driven models for wire capacitance, wire delay, and microarchitectural component delay. Using the results of these models, we measure the simulated performance---estimating both clock rate and IPC--- of an aggressive out-of-order microarchitecture as it is scaled from a 250nm technology to a 35nm technology. We perform this analysis for three clock scaling targets and two microarchitecture scaling strategies: pipeline scaling and capacity scaling. We find that no scaling strategy permits annual performance improvements of better than 12.5%, which is far worse than the annual 50-60% to which we have grown accustomed. 1

Keyphrases

conventional microarchitectures    clock rate versus ipc    clock rate    microprocessor performance    wire delay    superlinear scaling    semiconductor device    processor clock    achievable performance growth    scaling strategy    microarchitectural component delay    capacity scaling    technology generation    simulated performance    annual performance improvement    aggressive out-of-order microarchitecture    pipeline scaling    wire capacitance    poor wire scaling    technology-driven model    annual 50-60   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University