• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

DMCA

Trading structure for randomness in wireless opportunistic routing (2007)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [ccr.sigcomm.org]
  • [www.sigcomm.org]
  • [nms.lcs.mit.edu]
  • [www.stanford.edu]
  • [ccr.sigcomm.org]
  • [nms.csail.mit.edu]
  • [nms.lcs.mit.edu]
  • [www.engr.uconn.edu]
  • [www.cse.iitb.ac.in]
  • [www.engr.uconn.edu]
  • [dspace.mit.edu]
  • [people.csail.mit.edu]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Szymon Chachulski , Michael Jennings , Sachin Katti , Dina Katabi
Citations:294 - 7 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@TECHREPORT{Chachulski07tradingstructure,
    author = {Szymon Chachulski and Michael Jennings and Sachin Katti and Dina Katabi},
    title = {Trading structure for randomness in wireless opportunistic routing},
    institution = {},
    year = {2007}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Opportunistic routing is a recent technique that achieves high throughput in the face of lossy wireless links. The current opportunistic routing protocol, ExOR, ties the MAC with routing, imposing a strict schedule on routers ’ access to the medium. Although the scheduler delivers opportunistic gains, it misses some of the inherent features of the 802.11 MAC. For example, it prevents spatial reuse and thus may underutilize the wireless medium. It also eliminates the layering abstraction, making the protocol less amenable to extensions to alternate traffic types such as multicast. This paper presents MORE, a MAC-independent opportunistic routing protocol. MORE randomly mixes packets before forwarding them. This randomness ensures that routers that hear the same transmission do not forward the same packets. Thus, MORE needs no special scheduler to coordinate routers and can run directly on top of 802.11. Experimental results from a 20-node wireless testbed show that MORE’s median unicast throughput is 22 % higher than ExOR, and the gains rise to 45 % over ExOR when there is a chance of spatial reuse. For multicast, MORE’s gains increase with the number of destinations, and are 35-200 % greater than ExOR.

Keyphrases

wireless opportunistic routing    trading structure    spatial reuse    high throughput    strict schedule    router access    recent technique    scheduler delivers opportunistic gain    layering abstraction    wireless medium    special scheduler    opportunistic routing    mac-independent opportunistic routing protocol    lossy wireless link    20-node wireless    current opportunistic routing protocol    median unicast throughput    experimental result    inherent feature    traffic type    randomly mix packet   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University