• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Learning to Distinguish PP Arguments from Adjuncts

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [ilk.kub.nl]
  • [acl.ldc.upenn.edu]
  • [wing.comp.nus.edu.sg]
  • [aclweb.org]
  • [www.aclweb.org]
  • [ucrel.lancs.ac.uk]
  • [newdesign.aclweb.org]
  • [www.aclweb.org]
  • [wing.comp.nus.edu.sg]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Aline Villavicencio
Citations:6 - 0 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Villavicencio_learningto,
    author = {Aline Villavicencio},
    title = {Learning to Distinguish PP Arguments from Adjuncts},
    year = {}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Words differ in the subcategorisation frames in which they occur, and there is a strong correlation between the semantic arguments of a given word and its subcategorisation frame, so that all its arguments should be included in its subcategorisation frame. One problem is posed by the ambiguity between locative prepositional phrases as arguments of a verb or adjuncts. As the semantics for the verb is the same in both cases, it is difficult to differentiate them, and to learn the appropriate subcategorisation frame. We propose an approach that uses semantically motivated preposition selection and frequency information to determine if a locative PP is an argument or an adjunct. In order to test this approach, we perform an experiment using a computational learning system that receives as input utterances annotated with logical forms. The results obtained indicate that the learner successfully distinguishes between arguments (obligatory and optional) and adjuncts.

Keyphrases

pp argument    subcategorisation frame    preposition selection    locative pp    logical form    locative prepositional phrase    strong correlation    semantic argument    frequency information    computational learning system    input utterance    appropriate subcategorisation frame   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University