• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

DMCA

Sense-based Interpretation of Logical Metonymy Using a Statistical Method

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [aclweb.org]
  • [www.aclweb.org]
  • [wing.comp.nus.edu.sg]
  • [aclweb.org]
  • [www.aclweb.org]
  • [aclweb.org]
  • [nlp.csie.ncnu.edu.tw]
  • [newdesign.aclweb.org]
  • [wing.comp.nus.edu.sg]
  • [www.cl.cam.ac.uk]
  • [www.cl.cam.ac.uk]
  • [www.cl.cam.ac.uk]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Ekaterina Shutova
Citations:3 - 1 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Shutova_sense-basedinterpretation,
    author = {Ekaterina Shutova},
    title = {Sense-based Interpretation of Logical Metonymy Using a Statistical Method},
    year = {}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

The use of figurative language is ubiquitous in natural language texts and it is a serious bottleneck in automatic text understanding. We address the problem of interpretation of logical metonymy, using a statistical method. Our approach originates from that of Lapata and Lascarides (2003), which generates a list of nondisambiguated interpretations with their likelihood derived from a corpus. We propose a novel sense-based representation of the interpretation of logical metonymy and a more thorough evaluation method than that of Lapata and Lascarides (2003). By carrying out a human experiment we prove that such a representation is intuitive to human subjects. We derive a ranking scheme for verb senses using an unannotated corpus, WordNet sense numbering and glosses. We also provide an account of the requirements that different aspectual verbs impose onto the interpretation of logical metonymy. We tested our system on verb-object metonymic phrases. It identifies and ranks metonymic interpretations with the mean average precision of 0.83 as compared to the gold standard. 1

Keyphrases

logical metonymy    statistical method    sense-based interpretation    automatic text understanding    wordnet sense numbering    figurative language    serious bottleneck    ranking scheme    gold standard    nondisambiguated interpretation    mean average precision    verb sens    novel sense-based representation    metonymic interpretation    different aspectual verb    thorough evaluation method    unannotated corpus    human experiment    verb-object metonymic phrase    human subject    natural language text   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University