Syllable-frequency effect in visual word recognition: Evidence of sequential-type processing (2000)
| Venue: | Psicológica |
| Citations: | 6 - 3 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Alvarez00syllable-frequencyeffect,
author = {Carlos J. Alvarez and Manuel Carreiras and Manuel De Vega},
title = {Syllable-frequency effect in visual word recognition: Evidence of sequential-type processing},
journal = {Psicológica},
year = {2000},
volume = {21},
pages = {341--374}
}
Bookmark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
OpenURL
Abstract
f discussion for more than 20 years. Several sublexical structures have been proposed as functional units of encoding: morphemes (Gibson & Guinet, 1971; Murrell & Morton, 1974; Rapp, 1992; Taft & Forster, 1975), Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure-BOSS- (e.g. Taft, 1979), word body (Kay & Bishop, 1987; Patterson & Morton, 1985) and, recently, the body of the BOSS (Forster & Taft, 1994; Taft, 1992). Among Requests for reprint should be addressed to Carlos J. lvarez, Departamento de Psicologa Cognitiva, Universidad de La Laguna, 38201 Tenerife, Spain. Electronic mail may be sent to calvarez@ull.es. these proposals, the syllable has been one of the sublexical units which has received a greater attention (e.g., Ferrand, Segu & Grainger, 1996; Lima & Pollatsek, 1983; Millis, 1986; Printzmetal, Treiman & Rho, 1986; Rapp, 1992; Rapp, Alway & Caramazza, 1993; Spoehr & Smith, 1973; Taft & Forster, 1976; Tousman & Inhoff, 1992). In addition, several syllable-relat
