• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

DMCA

A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching (2001)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [research.microsoft.com]
  • [dbs.uni-leipzig.de]
  • [lips.informatik.uni-leipzig.de]
  • [www.cs.wisc.edu]
  • [disi.unitn.it]
  • [homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk]
  • [www.phenoflow.org]
  • [people.cs.ubc.ca]
  • [blondie.cs.byu.edu]
  • [se-pubs.dbs.uni-leipzig.de]
  • [disi.unitn.it]
  • [www.cise.ufl.edu]
  • [tesi.fabio.web.cs.unibo.it]
  • [disi.unitn.it]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • CiteULike
  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Erhard Rahm , Philip A. Bernstein
Venue:VLDB JOURNAL
Citations:1352 - 51 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{Rahm01asurvey,
    author = {Erhard Rahm and Philip A. Bernstein},
    title = {A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching},
    journal = {VLDB JOURNAL},
    year = {2001},
    volume = {10},
    pages = {2001}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Schema matching is a basic problem in many database application domains, such as data integration, E-business, data warehousing, and semantic query processing. In current implementations, schema matching is typically performed manually, which has significant limitations. On the other hand, previous research papers have proposed many techniques to achieve a partial automation of the match operation for specific application domains. We present a taxonomy that covers many of these existing approaches, and we describe the approaches in some detail. In particular, we distinguish between schema-level and instance-level, element-level and structure-level, and language-based and constraint-based matchers. Based on our classification we review some previous match implementations thereby indicating which part of the solution space they cover. We intend our taxonomy and review of past work to be useful when comparing different approaches to schema matching, when developing a new match algorithm, and when implementing a schema matching component.

Keyphrases

automatic schema matching    schema matching    constraint-based matcher    past work    previous match implementation    basic problem    partial automation    new match algorithm    specific application domain    different approach    many technique    schema matching component    match operation    semantic query processing    solution space    many database application domain    data warehousing    data integration    current implementation    previous research paper    significant limitation   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University