• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment (2001)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [faculty.virginia.edu]
  • [faculty.virginia.edu]
  • [ist-socrates.berkeley.edu]
  • [ist-socrates.berkeley.edu]
  • [www3.nd.edu]
  • [www.fed.cuhk.edu.hk]
  • [www3.nd.edu]
  • [www.motherjones.com]
  • [www.protevi.com]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Jonathan Haidt
Venue:Psychological Review
Citations:691 - 21 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{Haidt01theemotional,
    author = {Jonathan Haidt},
    title = {The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment},
    journal = {Psychological Review},
    year = {2001},
    volume = {108},
    pages = {814--834}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

This is the manuscript that was published, with only minor copy-editing alterations, as: Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review. 108, 814-834 Copyright 2001, American Psychological Association To obtain a reprint of the final type-set article, please go through your library’s journal services, or contact the author directly Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. Four reasons are given for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post-hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it de-emphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals, emphasizing instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent than rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as anthropology and primatology. Author notes

Keyphrases

moral judgment    social intuitionist approach    emotional dog    rational tail    moral reasoning    rationalist model    author note    post-hoc construction    minor copy-editing alteration    recent finding    automatic evaluation    american psychological association    cultural influence    psychological review    social intuitionist model    intuitionist model    social model    biological psychology    library journal service    final type-set article    private reasoning   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University