• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

DMCA

Optimal Aggregation Algorithms for Middleware (2001)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cs.duke.edu]
  • [www.cs.duke.edu]
  • [www.cs.duke.edu]
  • [www.cs.duke.edu]
  • [www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il]
  • [www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il]
  • [www.almaden.ibm.com]
  • [www.almaden.ibm.com]
  • [www.cs.fiu.edu]
  • [www.cs.ualberta.ca]
  • [researcher.watson.ibm.com]
  • [www-db.deis.unibo.it]
  • [www.cs.ucr.edu]
  • [webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca]
  • [www.cs.ucr.edu]
  • [www.cs.ucr.edu]
  • [www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il]
  • [www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il]
  • [www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il]
  • [www.almaden.ibm.com]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Ronald Fagin , Amnon Lotem , Moni Naor
Venue:IN PODS
Citations:715 - 4 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@INPROCEEDINGS{Fagin01optimalaggregation,
    author = {Ronald Fagin and Amnon Lotem and Moni Naor},
    title = {Optimal Aggregation Algorithms for Middleware},
    booktitle = {IN PODS},
    year = {2001},
    pages = {102--113},
    publisher = {}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Assume that each object in a database has m grades, or scores, one for each of m attributes. For example, an object can have a color grade, that tells how red it is, and a shape grade, that tells how round it is. For each attribute, there is a sorted list, which lists each object and its grade under that attribute, sorted by grade (highest grade first). There is some monotone aggregation function, or combining rule, such as min or average, that combines the individual grades to obtain an overall grade. To determine the top k objects (that have the best overall grades), the naive algorithm must access every object in the database, to find its grade under each attribute. Fagin has given an algorithm (“Fagin’s Algorithm”, or FA) that is much more efficient. For some monotone aggregation functions, FA is optimal with high probability in the worst case. We analyze an elegant and remarkably simple algorithm (“the threshold algorithm”, or TA) that is optimal in a much stronger sense than FA. We show that TA is essentially optimal, not just for some monotone aggregation functions, but for all of them, and not just in a high-probability worst-case sense, but over every database. Unlike FA, which requires large buffers (whose size may grow unboundedly as the database size grows), TA requires only a small, constant-size buffer. TA allows early stopping, which yields, in a precise sense, an approximate version of the top k answers. We distinguish

Keyphrases

optimal aggregation algorithm    aggregation function    overall grade    top object    individual grade    high-probability worst-case sense    monotone aggregation function    shape grade    color grade    simple algorithm    constant-size buffer    large buffer    sorted list    naive algorithm    precise sense    early stopping    high probability    top answer    approximate version    threshold algorithm    database size grows   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University