Inductive and Bayesian learning in medical diagnosis (1993)
| Venue: | Applied Artificial Intelligence |
| Citations: | 56 - 9 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Kononenko93inductiveand,
author = {Igor Kononenko},
title = {Inductive and Bayesian learning in medical diagnosis},
journal = {Applied Artificial Intelligence},
year = {1993},
volume = {7},
pages = {317--337}
}
Years of Citing Articles
OpenURL
Abstract
Abstract. Although successful in medical diagnostic problems, inductive learning systems were not widely accepted in medical practice. In this paper two di erent approaches to machine learning in medical appli-cations are compared: the system for inductive learning of decision trees Assistant, and the naive Bayesian classi er. Both methodologies were tested in four medical diagnostic problems: localization of primary tumor, prognostics of recurrence of breast cancer, diagnosis of thyroid diseases, and rheumatology. The accuracy of automatically acquired diagnostic knowledge from stored data records is compared and the interpretation of the knowledge and the explanation ability of the classi cation process of each system is discussed. Surprisingly, thenaiveBayesian classi er is superior to Assistant in classi cation accuracy and explanation ability, while the interpretation of the acquired knowledge seems to be equally valuable. In ad-dition, two extensions to naive Bayesian classi er are brie y described: dealing with continuous attributes, and discovering the dependencies among attributes.







