An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution (1994)
Cached
Download Links
- [webcourse.cs.technion.ac.il]
- [acl.ldc.upenn.edu]
- [www.wlv.ac.uk]
- DBLP
Other Repositories/Bibliography
| Venue: | Computational Linguistics |
| Citations: | 273 - 0 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Leass94analgorithm,
author = {Herbert J Leass},
title = {An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution},
journal = {Computational Linguistics},
year = {1994},
volume = {20},
pages = {535--561}
}
Years of Citing Articles
Bookmark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
OpenURL
Abstract
This paper presents an algorithm for identifying the noun phrase antecedents of third person pronouns and lexical anaphors (reflexives and reciprocals). The algorithm applies to the syntactic representations generated by McCord's Slot Grammar parser, and relies on salience measures derived from syntactic structure and a simple dynamic model of attentional state. Like the parser, the algorithm is implemented in Prolog. The authors have tested it extensively on computer manual texts, and conducted a blind test on manual text containing 360 pronoun occurrences. The algorithm successfully identifies the antecedent of the pronoun for 86 % of these pronoun occurrences. The relative contributions of the algorithm's components to its overall success rate in this blind test are examined. Experiments were conducted with an enhancement of the algorithm which contributes statistically modelled information concerning semantic and real world relations to the algorithm's decision procedure. Interestingly, this enhancement only marginally improves the algorithm's performance (by 2%). The algorithm is compared with other approaches to anaphora resolution which have been proposed in the literature. In particular, the search procedure of Hobbs ' algorithm was implemented in the Slot Grammar framework and applied to the sentences in the blind test set. The authors ' algorithm achieves a higher rate of success (4%) than Hobbs ' algorithm. The relation of the algorithm to the centering approach is discussed, as well as to models of anaphora resolution which invoke a variety of informational factors in ranking antecedent candidates. 1.
