• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

DMCA

A new proof of the density Hales-Jewett theorem (2009)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [annals.math.princeton.edu]
  • [annals.math.princeton.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [arxiv.org]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by D H J Polymath
Citations:39 - 2 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Polymath09anew,
    author = {D H J Polymath},
    title = {A new proof of the density Hales-Jewett theorem},
    year = {2009}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Abstract The Hales-Jewett theorem asserts that for every r and every k there exists n such that every r-colouring of the n-dimensional grid {1, . . . , k} n contains a monochromatic combinatorial line. This result is a generalization of van der Waerden's theorem, and it is one of the fundamental results of Ramsey theory. The theorem of van der Waerden has a famous density version, conjectured by Erdős and Turán in 1936, proved by Szemerédi in 1975, and given a different proof by Furstenberg in 1977. The Hales-Jewett theorem has a density version as well, proved by Furstenberg and Katznelson in 1991 by means of a significant extension of the ergodic techniques that had been pioneered by Furstenberg in his proof of Szemerédi's theorem. In this paper, we give the first elementary proof of the theorem of Furstenberg and Katznelson and the first to provide a quantitative bound on how large n needs to be. In particular, we show that a subset of {1, 2, 3} n of density δ contains a combinatorial line if n is at least as big as a tower of 2s of height O(1/δ 2 ). Our proof is surprisingly simple: indeed, it gives arguably the simplest known proof of Szemerédi's theorem.

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University