Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks

DMCA

Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks (2000)

Cached

Download Links

Other Repositories/Bibliography

DBLP

by Samir R. Das , Charles E. Perkins , Elizabeth M. Royer

Citations:

553 - 21 self

BibTeX

@INPROCEEDINGS{Das00performancecomparison,
    author = {Samir R. Das and Charles E. Perkins and Elizabeth M. Royer},
    title = {Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks},
    booktitle = {},
    year = {2000},
    pages = {3--12},
    publisher = {}
}

OpenURL

Abstract

Ad hoc networks are characterized by multihop wireless connectivity, frequently changing network topology and the need for efficient dynamic routing protocols. We compare the performance of two prominent ondemand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks — Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV). A detailed simulation model with MAC and physical layer models is used to study interlayer interactions and their performance implications. We demonstrate that even though DSR and AODV share a similar on-demand behavior, the differences in the protocol mechanics can lead to significant performance differentials. The performance differentials are analyzed using varying network load, mobility and network size. Based on the observations, we make recommendations about how the performance of either protocol can be improved.

Keyphrases

ad hoc network on-demand routing protocol performance comparison performance implication multihop wireless connectivity network size efficient dynamic routing protocol detailed simulation model protocol mechanic physical layer model performance differential abstract ad hoc network prominent ondemand routing protocol network load aodv share significant performance differential similar on-demand behavior network topology interlayer interaction

DMCA