A quantitative comparison of graph-based models for internet topology (1997)
Cached
Download Links
- [www.ssfnet.org]
- [www.cc.gatech.edu]
- [cs.baylor.edu]
- DBLP
Other Repositories/Bibliography
| Venue: | IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING |
| Citations: | 204 - 3 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Zegura97aquantitative,
author = {Ellen W. Zegura and Kenneth L. Calvert and Michael J. Donahoo},
title = {A quantitative comparison of graph-based models for internet topology},
journal = {IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING},
year = {1997},
volume = {5},
pages = {770--783}
}
Years of Citing Articles
OpenURL
Abstract
Graphs are commonly used to model the topological structure of internetworks, to study problems ranging from routing to resource reservation. A variety of graphs are found in the literature, including fixed topologies such as rings or stars, "well-known" topologies such as the ARPAnet, and randomly generated topologies. While many researchers rely upon graphs for analytic and simulation studies, there has been little analysis of the implications of using a particular model, or how the graph generation method may a ect the results of such studies. Further, the selection of one generation method over another is often arbitrary, since the differences and similarities between methods are not well understood. This paper considers the problem of generating and selecting graph models that reflect the properties of real internetworks. We review generation methods in common use, and also propose several new methods. We consider a set of metrics that characterize the graphs produced by a method, and we quantify similarities and differences amongst several generation methods with respect to these metrics. We also consider the effect of the graph model in the context of a speciffic problem, namely multicast routing.







